the establishment is going after Cruz

[awesome guy]

http://conservativetribune.com/gop-inve ... n-ted-cruz

[HokieFanDC]

http://conservativetribune.com/gop-inve ... n-ted-cruz

You should read this article, posted by awesomeguy about 5 1/2 hours ago, which says they are not going after Ted Cruz.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/sen ... in-debate/

[awesome guy]

http://conservativetribune.com/gop-inve ... n-ted-cruz

You should read this article, posted by awesomeguy about 5 1/2 hours ago, which says they are not going after Ted Cruz.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/sen ... in-debate/

golly gee, maybe they changed their mind?

[HokieFanDC]

http://conservativetribune.com/gop-inve ... n-ted-cruz

You should read this article, posted by awesomeguy about 5 1/2 hours ago, which says they are not going after Ted Cruz.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/sen ... in-debate/

golly gee, maybe they changed their mind?

What am I missing? You posted an article this morning, that specifically said there was not going to be an investigation. That article was from yesterday. So, as of this morning, we all knew there was not going to be an investigation of Cruz. So, why post an obviously false article, after you had already posted an article that proved your 2nd article was wrong??

[awesome guy]

http://conservativetribune.com/gop-inve ... n-ted-cruz

You should read this article, posted by awesomeguy about 5 1/2 hours ago, which says they are not going after Ted Cruz.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/sen ... in-debate/

golly gee, maybe they changed their mind?

What am I missing? You posted an article this morning, that specifically said there was not going to be an investigation. That article was from yesterday. So, as of this morning, we all knew there was not going to be an investigation of Cruz. So, why post an obviously false article, after you had already posted an article that proved your 2nd article was wrong??

Are you aware of the concept of time and now facts change over it? There's nothing obviously fake about this article, read the link on it to the hill.

[HokieFanDC]

http://conservativetribune.com/gop-inve ... n-ted-cruz

You should read this article, posted by awesomeguy about 5 1/2 hours ago, which says they are not going after Ted Cruz.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/sen ... in-debate/

golly gee, maybe they changed their mind?

What am I missing? You posted an article this morning, that specifically said there was not going to be an investigation. That article was from yesterday. So, as of this morning, we all knew there was not going to be an investigation of Cruz. So, why post an obviously false article, after you had already posted an article that proved your 2nd article was wrong??

Are you aware of the concept of time and now facts change over it? There's nothing obviously fake about this article, read the link on it to the hill.

What?? Yes, things changed. Yesterday, the intelligence was deciding whether to launch an investigation. Yesterday, they made the decision not to.

This morning, YOU posted an article confirming that there would be NO INVESTIGATION. 5 1/2 hours later, YOU post an article saying there is an investigation, already knowing there wasn't one, based on the article YOU POSTED.