RiverguyVT wrote:That's a lot like the "Palin sees Russia from her porch" mischaracterization.
Not wanting 10s of thousands of unvetted new men from terror nations coming in is not the definition of racism I'm familiar with. Is Carter racist? He shipped 'em back out! Trump never said he'd "ban muslims" (which implies shipping those already here, out). You're falling for a false narrative. So no, not based on fact.
1- I missed where he "bans" muslims. Is this an immigration question, or one of existing citizens?
2- is a muslim from Asia the same race as one from North Africa, and as one from the Mid East? Race????
Maybe i should watch the vid 3 more times to listen for the dog whistle that the NYT has trained you to hear.
Got it! Good luck with your candidate and this rhetoric going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
RiverguyVT wrote:Meh. He says he's done. If Hillary wins, the R party is over anyway.
That's music to ip and nolan's ears.
If puts an end to the GOP's continued implementation of Nixon's southern strategy, you are correct.
Nixon's "southern strategy" is about as relevant today as a buggy whip. But regardless. It Trump wins, the R party may have to change with him. If Trump loses, the party is toast. The way I see it, the R party as we've recently known it is at an end, no matter what. The ??? Becomes, "what next?"
Nope. The racist white southerner have been supporting Republicans for years for a reason. Not a coincidence.
Trump as your party leader is the natural result of this. [emoji375][emoji375]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOL. The racist never left the democratic party moonbat.
RiverguyVT wrote:Meh. He says he's done. If Hillary wins, the R party is over anyway.
That's music to ip and nolan's ears.
If puts an end to the GOP's continued implementation of Nixon's southern strategy, you are correct.
Nixon's "southern strategy" is about as relevant today as a buggy whip. But regardless. It Trump wins, the R party may have to change with him. If Trump loses, the party is toast. The way I see it, the R party as we've recently known it is at an end, no matter what. The ??? Becomes, "what next?"
Nope. The racist white southerner have been supporting Republicans for years for a reason. Not a coincidence.
Trump as your party leader is the natural result of this. [emoji375][emoji375]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOL. The racist never left the democratic party moonbat.
Do you vote Republican or Democrat?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
RiverguyVT wrote:Meh. He says he's done. If Hillary wins, the R party is over anyway.
That's music to ip and nolan's ears.
If puts an end to the GOP's continued implementation of Nixon's southern strategy, you are correct.
Nixon's "southern strategy" is about as relevant today as a buggy whip. But regardless. It Trump wins, the R party may have to change with him. If Trump loses, the party is toast. The way I see it, the R party as we've recently known it is at an end, no matter what. The ??? Becomes, "what next?"
This is incorrect. Republicans currently control the house, the senate, a majority of governors, and a majority of state legislators. They win a lot. If they had just nominated a Republican in 2016, they'd probably be winning the Presidency too. Whatever you think of Obama, he was an extremely effective campaigner, in a time when people were sick of W. Clinton will likely win, but I'd guess she's only a one term president with at least a Republican House.
The party is toast if they double down on personalities like Trump after this year, rather than promoting candidates that have a conservative and inclusive message. Trump is actively driving people out of the party. The bleeding needs to stop.
The party is in clear disarray. Cantor was beaten in a primary. Ryan is fighting for his political life. The Tea Party wants one thing. The establishment types want another (dem lite). The evangelicals want still another. It isn't a coalition moving in one direction. Now, they've got a pres candidate who isn't even a republican.
The party is toast.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
HokieJoe wrote:
That's music to ip and nolan's ears.
If puts an end to the GOP's continued implementation of Nixon's southern strategy, you are correct.
Nixon's "southern strategy" is about as relevant today as a buggy whip. But regardless. It Trump wins, the R party may have to change with him. If Trump loses, the party is toast. The way I see it, the R party as we've recently known it is at an end, no matter what. The ??? Becomes, "what next?"
Nope. The racist white southerner have been supporting Republicans for years for a reason. Not a coincidence.
Trump as your party leader is the natural result of this. [emoji375][emoji375]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOL. The racist never left the democratic party moonbat.
RiverguyVT wrote:Meh. He says he's done. If Hillary wins, the R party is over anyway.
That's music to ip and nolan's ears.
If puts an end to the GOP's continued implementation of Nixon's southern strategy, you are correct.
Nixon's "southern strategy" is about as relevant today as a buggy whip. But regardless. It Trump wins, the R party may have to change with him. If Trump loses, the party is toast. The way I see it, the R party as we've recently known it is at an end, no matter what. The ??? Becomes, "what next?"
This is incorrect. Republicans currently control the house, the senate, a majority of governors, and a majority of state legislators. They win a lot. If they had just nominated a Republican in 2016, they'd probably be winning the Presidency too. Whatever you think of Obama, he was an extremely effective campaigner, in a time when people were sick of W. Clinton will likely win, but I'd guess she's only a one term president with at least a Republican House.
The party is toast if they double down on personalities like Trump after this year, rather than promoting candidates that have a conservative and inclusive message. Trump is actively driving people out of the party. The bleeding needs to stop.
The party is in clear disarray. Cantor was beaten in a primary. Ryan is fighting for his political life. The Tea Party wants one thing. The establishment types want another (dem lite). The evangelicals want still another. It isn't a coalition moving in one direction. Now, they've got a pres candidate who isn't even a republican.
The party is toast.
Obviously divided and they will lose ground this cycle because of it, but there's currently no alternative to the Republican party, and our system is pretty resistant to anything but a 2 party system. There's a lot propping the Republican party up while it eats itself from the inside. Republicans still win a ton of elections and it's likely things will calm down once Trump fades away.
RiverguyVT wrote:Meh. He says he's done. If Hillary wins, the R party is over anyway.
That's music to ip and nolan's ears.
If puts an end to the GOP's continued implementation of Nixon's southern strategy, you are correct.
Nixon's "southern strategy" is about as relevant today as a buggy whip. But regardless. It Trump wins, the R party may have to change with him. If Trump loses, the party is toast. The way I see it, the R party as we've recently known it is at an end, no matter what. The ??? Becomes, "what next?"
This is incorrect. Republicans currently control the house, the senate, a majority of governors, and a majority of state legislators. They win a lot. If they had just nominated a Republican in 2016, they'd probably be winning the Presidency too. Whatever you think of Obama, he was an extremely effective campaigner, in a time when people were sick of W. Clinton will likely win, but I'd guess she's only a one term president with at least a Republican House.
The party is toast if they double down on personalities like Trump after this year, rather than promoting candidates that have a conservative and inclusive message. Trump is actively driving people out of the party. The bleeding needs to stop.
The party is in clear disarray. Cantor was beaten in a primary. Ryan is fighting for his political life. The Tea Party wants one thing. The establishment types want another (dem lite). The evangelicals want still another. It isn't a coalition moving in one direction. Now, they've got a pres candidate who isn't even a republican.
The party is toast.
Houtex has been saying this for a long time. You guys should listen to him, instead of lashing out at the truth hammer. [emoji375][emoji375]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
HokieJoe wrote:
That's music to ip and nolan's ears.
If puts an end to the GOP's continued implementation of Nixon's southern strategy, you are correct.
Nixon's "southern strategy" is about as relevant today as a buggy whip. But regardless. It Trump wins, the R party may have to change with him. If Trump loses, the party is toast. The way I see it, the R party as we've recently known it is at an end, no matter what. The ??? Becomes, "what next?"
This is incorrect. Republicans currently control the house, the senate, a majority of governors, and a majority of state legislators. They win a lot. If they had just nominated a Republican in 2016, they'd probably be winning the Presidency too. Whatever you think of Obama, he was an extremely effective campaigner, in a time when people were sick of W. Clinton will likely win, but I'd guess she's only a one term president with at least a Republican House.
The party is toast if they double down on personalities like Trump after this year, rather than promoting candidates that have a conservative and inclusive message. Trump is actively driving people out of the party. The bleeding needs to stop.
The party is in clear disarray. Cantor was beaten in a primary. Ryan is fighting for his political life. The Tea Party wants one thing. The establishment types want another (dem lite). The evangelicals want still another. It isn't a coalition moving in one direction. Now, they've got a pres candidate who isn't even a republican.
The party is toast.
Obviously divided and they will lose ground this cycle because of it, but there's currently no alternative to the Republican party, and our system is pretty resistant to anything but a 2 party system. There's a lot propping the Republican party up while it eats itself from the inside. Republicans still win a ton of elections and it's likely things will calm down once Trump fades away.
Hilarious. Your guys are running a crime boss who literally needs to be propped up and it's the Republicans that are eating from within? Pass whatever it is you're smoking, it's obviously good stuff.
ieatbacon wrote:
Obviously divided and they will lose ground this cycle because of it, but there's currently no alternative to the Republican party, and our system is pretty resistant to anything but a 2 party system. There's a lot propping the Republican party up while it eats itself from the inside. Republicans still win a ton of elections and it's likely things will calm down once Trump fades away.
Hilarious. Your guys are running a crime boss who literally needs to be propped up and it's the Republicans that are eating from within? Pass whatever it is you're smoking, it's obviously good stuff.
Gary Johnson is a crime boss! Or was it John Kasich that's the crime boss? Or maybe Ted Cruz?
ieatbacon wrote:
Obviously divided and they will lose ground this cycle because of it, but there's currently no alternative to the Republican party, and our system is pretty resistant to anything but a 2 party system. There's a lot propping the Republican party up while it eats itself from the inside. Republicans still win a ton of elections and it's likely things will calm down once Trump fades away.
Hilarious. Your guys are running a crime boss who literally needs to be propped up and it's the Republicans that are eating from within? Pass whatever it is you're smoking, it's obviously good stuff.
Gary Johnson is a crime boss! Or was it John Kasich that's the crime boss? Or maybe Ted Cruz?
RiverguyVT wrote:That's a lot like the "Palin sees Russia from her porch" mischaracterization.
Not wanting 10s of thousands of unvetted new men from terror nations coming in is not the definition of racism I'm familiar with. Is Carter racist? He shipped 'em back out! Trump never said he'd "ban muslims" (which implies shipping those already here, out). You're falling for a false narrative. So no, not based on fact.
1- I missed where he "bans" muslims. Is this an immigration question, or one of existing citizens?
2- is a muslim from Asia the same race as one from North Africa, and as one from the Mid East? Race????
Maybe i should watch the vid 3 more times to listen for the dog whistle that the NYT has trained you to hear.
Got it! Good luck with your candidate and this rhetoric going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ip, we know you're lack of political sophistication renders you susceptible to soap opera-like arguments. We're trying to steer you away from such unfounded silliness.
Help us help you!
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
RiverguyVT wrote:That's a lot like the "Palin sees Russia from her porch" mischaracterization.
Not wanting 10s of thousands of unvetted new men from terror nations coming in is not the definition of racism I'm familiar with. Is Carter racist? He shipped 'em back out! Trump never said he'd "ban muslims" (which implies shipping those already here, out). You're falling for a false narrative. So no, not based on fact.
1- I missed where he "bans" muslims. Is this an immigration question, or one of existing citizens?
2- is a muslim from Asia the same race as one from North Africa, and as one from the Mid East? Race????
Maybe i should watch the vid 3 more times to listen for the dog whistle that the NYT has trained you to hear.
Got it! Good luck with your candidate and this rhetoric going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ip, we know you're lack of political sophistication renders you susceptible to soap opera-like arguments. We're trying to steer you away from such unfounded silliness.
Help us help you!
In posts alleging lack of sophistication, it's good to nail down 1st grade grammar.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
RiverguyVT wrote:That's a lot like the "Palin sees Russia from her porch" mischaracterization.
Not wanting 10s of thousands of unvetted new men from terror nations coming in is not the definition of racism I'm familiar with. Is Carter racist? He shipped 'em back out! Trump never said he'd "ban muslims" (which implies shipping those already here, out). You're falling for a false narrative. So no, not based on fact.
1- I missed where he "bans" muslims. Is this an immigration question, or one of existing citizens?
2- is a muslim from Asia the same race as one from North Africa, and as one from the Mid East? Race????
Maybe i should watch the vid 3 more times to listen for the dog whistle that the NYT has trained you to hear.
Got it! Good luck with your candidate and this rhetoric going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ah, got it. Once again just a quick quip when you have nothing to say. Seems to be your standard these days
RiverguyVT wrote:That's a lot like the "Palin sees Russia from her porch" mischaracterization.
Not wanting 10s of thousands of unvetted new men from terror nations coming in is not the definition of racism I'm familiar with. Is Carter racist? He shipped 'em back out! Trump never said he'd "ban muslims" (which implies shipping those already here, out). You're falling for a false narrative. So no, not based on fact.
1- I missed where he "bans" muslims. Is this an immigration question, or one of existing citizens?
2- is a muslim from Asia the same race as one from North Africa, and as one from the Mid East? Race????
Maybe i should watch the vid 3 more times to listen for the dog whistle that the NYT has trained you to hear.
Got it! Good luck with your candidate and this rhetoric going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ah, got it. Once again just a quick quip when you have nothing to say. Seems to be your standard these days
[emoji8]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
RiverguyVT wrote:That's a lot like the "Palin sees Russia from her porch" mischaracterization.
Not wanting 10s of thousands of unvetted new men from terror nations coming in is not the definition of racism I'm familiar with. Is Carter racist? He shipped 'em back out! Trump never said he'd "ban muslims" (which implies shipping those already here, out). You're falling for a false narrative. So no, not based on fact.
1- I missed where he "bans" muslims. Is this an immigration question, or one of existing citizens?
2- is a muslim from Asia the same race as one from North Africa, and as one from the Mid East? Race????
Maybe i should watch the vid 3 more times to listen for the dog whistle that the NYT has trained you to hear.
Got it! Good luck with your candidate and this rhetoric going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ah, got it. Once again just a quick quip when you have nothing to say. Seems to be your standard these days
RiverguyVT wrote:That's a lot like the "Palin sees Russia from her porch" mischaracterization.
Not wanting 10s of thousands of unvetted new men from terror nations coming in is not the definition of racism I'm familiar with. Is Carter racist? He shipped 'em back out! Trump never said he'd "ban muslims" (which implies shipping those already here, out). You're falling for a false narrative. So no, not based on fact.
1- I missed where he "bans" muslims. Is this an immigration question, or one of existing citizens?
2- is a muslim from Asia the same race as one from North Africa, and as one from the Mid East? Race????
Maybe i should watch the vid 3 more times to listen for the dog whistle that the NYT has trained you to hear.
Got it! Good luck with your candidate and this rhetoric going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ip, we know you're lack of political sophistication renders you susceptible to soap opera-like arguments. We're trying to steer you away from such unfounded silliness.
Help us help you!
In posts alleging lack of sophistication, it's good to nail down 1st grade grammar.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thnx mS. mAnneRs!
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
1- I missed where he "bans" muslims. Is this an immigration question, or one of existing citizens?
2- is a muslim from Asia the same race as one from North Africa, and as one from the Mid East? Race????
Maybe i should watch the vid 3 more times to listen for the dog whistle that the NYT has trained you to hear.
Got it! Good luck with your candidate and this rhetoric going forward.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ah, got it. Once again just a quick quip when you have nothing to say. Seems to be your standard these days
[emoji8]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, you just can't compete. Sorry.
You win!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
