No slippery slope.....

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26379
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

No slippery slope.....

Post by HokieHam »

You give the left an inch..........Nolan rejoices!
This book provides a philosophical analysis of adult–child sex and pedophilia. This sex intuitively strikes many people as sick, disgusting, and wrong. The problem is that it is not clear whether these judgments are justified and whether they are aesthetic or moral. By analogy, many people find it disgusting to view images of obese people having sex, but it is hard to see what is morally undesirable about such sex: here the judgment is aesthetic.

https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781498504461/P ... -Analysis#
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
User avatar
Major Kong
Posts: 15728
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
Party: Independent
Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Major Kong »

HokieHam wrote:You give the left an inch..........Nolan rejoices!
This book provides a philosophical analysis of adult–child sex and pedophilia. This sex intuitively strikes many people as sick, disgusting, and wrong. The problem is that it is not clear whether these judgments are justified and whether they are aesthetic or moral. By analogy, many people find it disgusting to view images of obese people having sex, but it is hard to see what is morally undesirable about such sex: here the judgment is aesthetic.

Clicky here ☺
Help a brother out. :)
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.

Image
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26379
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by HokieHam »

Major Kong wrote:
HokieHam wrote:You give the left an inch..........Nolan rejoices!
This book provides a philosophical analysis of adult–child sex and pedophilia. This sex intuitively strikes many people as sick, disgusting, and wrong. The problem is that it is not clear whether these judgments are justified and whether they are aesthetic or moral. By analogy, many people find it disgusting to view images of obese people having sex, but it is hard to see what is morally undesirable about such sex: here the judgment is aesthetic.

Clicky here ☺
Help a brother out. :)
:D
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by RiverguyVT »

Arguing for pedophilia, using aesthetics? LOL. WTH?
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
Uprising
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: etc

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Uprising »

How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by USN_Hokie »

Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation. FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26379
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by HokieHam »

USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation. FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
Yup.
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by cwtcr hokie »

HokieHam wrote:You give the left an inch..........Nolan rejoices!
This book provides a philosophical analysis of adult–child sex and pedophilia. This sex intuitively strikes many people as sick, disgusting, and wrong. The problem is that it is not clear whether these judgments are justified and whether they are aesthetic or moral. By analogy, many people find it disgusting to view images of obese people having sex, but it is hard to see what is morally undesirable about such sex: here the judgment is aesthetic.

https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781498504461/P ... -Analysis#
west virginians rejoice!!, they have ignored ages for years anyways
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26379
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by HokieHam »

Awwww......here's another heartwarming story for Nolan to revel in.....

The slippery slope is turning into a slip and slide!
'We ended up kissing and kissing led to other things': Mother, 36, and son, 19, who fell in love when they met last year after she gave him up for adoption as a baby, say they'll go to JAIL to defend their relationship

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4H2KMZCEY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -love.html
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by RiverguyVT »

Are those prison-tatt teardrops under her eye!?
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
Uprising
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: etc

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Uprising »

USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26379
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by HokieHam »

Uprising wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
It was the left that was pushing for the redefinition of "marriage".....now the nuts will come out of the woodwork, as has been clearly proven, and with the use of lawyers and leftist judges......other barriers will fall.
If all "love" is equal, you should be celebrating the mother son relationship.....the pedophile who just loves his neighbors child.....the same sex thruple.....polygamy. Make it all legal. Hell, move to Canada if you want to pork your pet......it'll be legal here soon as well.
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by awesome guy »

HokieHam wrote:
Uprising wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
It was the left that was pushing for the redefinition of "marriage".....now the nuts will come out of the woodwork, as has been clearly proven, and with the use of lawyers and leftist judges......other barriers will fall.
If all "love" is equal, you should be celebrating the mother son relationship.....the pedophile who just loves his neighbors child.....the same sex thruple.....polygamy. Make it all legal. Hell, move to Canada if you want to pork your pet......it'll be legal here soon as well.
Yep. This is a clear cut part of the left's sexual liberty and atheist movement.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
Uprising
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: etc

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Uprising »

HokieHam wrote:
Uprising wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
It was the left that was pushing for the redefinition of "marriage".....now the nuts will come out of the woodwork, as has been clearly proven, and with the use of lawyers and leftist judges......other barriers will fall.
If all "love" is equal, you should be celebrating the mother son relationship.....the pedophile who just loves his neighbors child.....the same sex thruple.....polygamy. Make it all legal. Hell, move to Canada if you want to pork your pet......it'll be legal here soon as well.
Don't you think the entire planet was populated through righteous incest? That it was all in your god's plan, right? That is, after he committed the greatest genocide ever, if you are to be believed, he left one family to repopulate the planet.

Then there is this:
Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
There was no need for a "redefinition" of marriage. No one had to look further than your god who had condoned all those things, well, with the exception of homosexuality. Funny, isn't it?
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by awesome guy »

Uprising wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
Uprising wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
It was the left that was pushing for the redefinition of "marriage".....now the nuts will come out of the woodwork, as has been clearly proven, and with the use of lawyers and leftist judges......other barriers will fall.
If all "love" is equal, you should be celebrating the mother son relationship.....the pedophile who just loves his neighbors child.....the same sex thruple.....polygamy. Make it all legal. Hell, move to Canada if you want to pork your pet......it'll be legal here soon as well.
Don't you think the entire planet was populated through righteous incest? That it was all in your god's plan, right? That is, after he committed the greatest genocide ever, if you are to be believed, he left one family to repopulate the planet.

Then there is this:
Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
There was no need for a "redefinition" of marriage. No one had to look further than your god who had condoned all those things, well, with the exception of homosexuality. Funny, isn't it?
You could have just conceded the point since that's what you effectively did.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by USN_Hokie »

Uprising wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
Uprising wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
It was the left that was pushing for the redefinition of "marriage".....now the nuts will come out of the woodwork, as has been clearly proven, and with the use of lawyers and leftist judges......other barriers will fall.
If all "love" is equal, you should be celebrating the mother son relationship.....the pedophile who just loves his neighbors child.....the same sex thruple.....polygamy. Make it all legal. Hell, move to Canada if you want to pork your pet......it'll be legal here soon as well.
Don't you think the entire planet was populated through righteous incest? That it was all in your god's plan, right? That is, after he committed the greatest genocide ever, if you are to be believed, he left one family to repopulate the planet.

Then there is this:
Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
There was no need for a "redefinition" of marriage. No one had to look further than your god who had condoned all those things, well, with the exception of homosexuality. Funny, isn't it?
And in this post, Uprising makes Ham's argument.
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26379
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by HokieHam »

USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
Uprising wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
It was the left that was pushing for the redefinition of "marriage".....now the nuts will come out of the woodwork, as has been clearly proven, and with the use of lawyers and leftist judges......other barriers will fall.
If all "love" is equal, you should be celebrating the mother son relationship.....the pedophile who just loves his neighbors child.....the same sex thruple.....polygamy. Make it all legal. Hell, move to Canada if you want to pork your pet......it'll be legal here soon as well.
Don't you think the entire planet was populated through righteous incest? That it was all in your god's plan, right? That is, after he committed the greatest genocide ever, if you are to be believed, he left one family to repopulate the planet.

Then there is this:
Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
There was no need for a "redefinition" of marriage. No one had to look further than your god who had condoned all those things, well, with the exception of homosexuality. Funny, isn't it?
And in this post, Uprising makes Ham's argument.
I was going to respond to his attack on religion, but I'll just revel in the victory...... :lol: :lol:
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
User avatar
Uprising
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: etc

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Uprising »

USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
Uprising wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:How do you blame this author's work on the left? He's also written against affirmative action, against diversity policies in his school, in defense of torture, and about how conservatives are being shut out of academia... by the left. And he also wrote a critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates writings on Black Lives Matter. This guy is clearly your hero.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
It was the left that was pushing for the redefinition of "marriage".....now the nuts will come out of the woodwork, as has been clearly proven, and with the use of lawyers and leftist judges......other barriers will fall.
If all "love" is equal, you should be celebrating the mother son relationship.....the pedophile who just loves his neighbors child.....the same sex thruple.....polygamy. Make it all legal. Hell, move to Canada if you want to pork your pet......it'll be legal here soon as well.
Don't you think the entire planet was populated through righteous incest? That it was all in your god's plan, right? That is, after he committed the greatest genocide ever, if you are to be believed, he left one family to repopulate the planet.

Then there is this:
Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
There was no need for a "redefinition" of marriage. No one had to look further than your god who had condoned all those things, well, with the exception of homosexuality. Funny, isn't it?
And in this post, Uprising makes Ham's argument.
LOL...
Pointing out that his religion, which he claims is the source of what is eternally moral, has condoned pedophilia and incest (but not homosexually) since it's inception, is making his argument that homosexually is a slippery slope to pedophilia and incest?
Good stuff.
User avatar
Uprising
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: etc

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Uprising »

HokieHam wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote:
HokieHam wrote:
Uprising wrote:
USN_Hokie wrote: I don't see how your question is relevant. The result is what matters, not the motivation.
When someone assigns blame, as Ham did to the left, for the actions of another, they are blaming the ideology for motivating the behavior. So perhaps you should have directed this comment at the OP.

However, I doubt you'd be saying this if his views aligned largely with the left...
Not to mention that it is the left that has consistently been pushing for stricter definitions of consent, often times to the resistance of the right. And that there are many religious right groups and individuals pushing for lower age of consent, often times to the resistance of the left. But because "the left" thinks two adults with penises should be allowed to have consensual sex, it's "the left's" fault if someone, who seems to align largely with the right, questions whether pedophilia is immoral.
USN_Hokie wrote:FWIW - this prof seems to get off on being a contrarian.
That's pretty much the point of engaging in philosophical argument.
It was the left that was pushing for the redefinition of "marriage".....now the nuts will come out of the woodwork, as has been clearly proven, and with the use of lawyers and leftist judges......other barriers will fall.
If all "love" is equal, you should be celebrating the mother son relationship.....the pedophile who just loves his neighbors child.....the same sex thruple.....polygamy. Make it all legal. Hell, move to Canada if you want to pork your pet......it'll be legal here soon as well.
Don't you think the entire planet was populated through righteous incest? That it was all in your god's plan, right? That is, after he committed the greatest genocide ever, if you are to be believed, he left one family to repopulate the planet.

Then there is this:
Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
There was no need for a "redefinition" of marriage. No one had to look further than your god who had condoned all those things, well, with the exception of homosexuality. Funny, isn't it?
And in this post, Uprising makes Ham's argument.
I was going to respond to his attack on religion, but I'll just revel in the victory...... [emoji38] [emoji38]
Please do give it a try. I can't wait to see your excuses for why it is immoral now but wasn't then.
"Context! You are taking it all out of context!"
Is that what you were going to go with?
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by USN_Hokie »

Uprising wrote: LOL...
Pointing out that his religion, which he claims is the source of what is eternally moral, has condoned pedophilia and incest (but not homosexually) since it's inception, is making his argument that homosexually is a slippery slope to pedophilia and incest?
Good stuff.
You're turning yourself in knots, but go ahead and indulge me - how does that passage endorse incest/pedophilia?
User avatar
Uprising
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: etc

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Uprising »

USN_Hokie wrote:
Uprising wrote: LOL...
Pointing out that his religion, which he claims is the source of what is eternally moral, has condoned pedophilia and incest (but not homosexually) since it's inception, is making his argument that homosexually is a slippery slope to pedophilia and incest?
Good stuff.
You're turning yourself in knots, but go ahead and indulge me - how does that passage endorse incest/pedophilia?
"save for yourselves every girl ["women children" in KJV] who has never slept with a man"
What do you think they save them for?
User avatar
RiverguyVT
Posts: 30268
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by RiverguyVT »

I have never seen Uprising ever come remotely close to accurate or appropriate biblical interpretation.

That said, am I the only one that sees irony in his taking this topic up with Hokie Ham?


:D
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
User avatar
Uprising
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: etc

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Uprising »

RiverguyVT wrote:I have never seen Uprising ever come remotely close to accurate or appropriate biblical interpretation.

That said, am I the only one that sees irony in his taking this topic up with Hokie Ham?


:D
It's ironic coming from the guy who critiques Islam in much the same way but gets all uppity when someone treats his religion likewise.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by awesome guy »

RiverguyVT wrote:I have never seen Uprising ever come remotely close to accurate or appropriate biblical interpretation.

That said, am I the only one that sees irony in his taking this topic up with Hokie Ham?


:D
You have a good point. No wonder he hates God with that ignorant and silly view of him.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
Uprising
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:44 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: etc

Re: No slippery slope.....

Post by Uprising »

awesome guy wrote:
RiverguyVT wrote:I have never seen Uprising ever come remotely close to accurate or appropriate biblical interpretation.

That said, am I the only one that sees irony in his taking this topic up with Hokie Ham?


:D
You have a good point. No wonder he hates God with that ignorant and silly view of him.
With your great understanding of your inerrant book, then you should be able to explain why it was OK for Noah's family to have incestuous relationships but not these folks from NM... It is clear that is what your god wanted because he did murder every other living person. So if your god wanted it, it must be moral. That's how your morality works, amirite?
Post Reply