Immunity for guy who deleted emails. Why...?

[oaktonhokie]

The FIB must have liked the guy. Doesn't seem he'll testify.

Like Brian paglia.

Why give immunity, for nothing?

But now that he has immunity, what is to stop him from doing something Clinton's never do… Tell the truth ? Could a condition of immunity be that he will not testify?

I am confused. Clearly the Clintons are rigging the system yet again. But they seem vulnerable to an immunized truth teller.

Unless he has been threatened or bribed.

Any lawyers here...?


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/09/us/po ... .html?_r=0