Shocking: voter fraud
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Shocking: voter fraud
VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?awesome guy wrote:VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15753
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
If the state already has it then the State has it.HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Seems CA would want to release the info to put to bed the notion that they had significant voter fraud. Or maybe....
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30299
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Recall, his very first move as new prez was to take over the census...so...HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?awesome guy wrote:VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
So, you are agreeing that the fed gov should not have that info?RiverguyVT wrote:Recall, his very first move as new prez was to take over the census...so...HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?awesome guy wrote:VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
It was wrong of Obama to take over the census. It was a pure move to manipulate census data to improve Dem chances of winning Congressional seats. The SCOTUS already shot down the sampling methods he wanted to employ, in 1999, but I don't think it was ever challenged this time around.
So, if it was wrong of Obama to take that power grab, then it is even worse to give the fed gov access to much more personal and private info, isn't it?
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
They should have it to investigate voter fraud. Not sure why this is an issue other than burying fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:So, you are agreeing that the fed gov should not have that info?RiverguyVT wrote:Recall, his very first move as new prez was to take over the census...so...HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?awesome guy wrote:VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
It was wrong of Obama to take over the census. It was a pure move to manipulate census data to improve Dem chances of winning Congressional seats. The SCOTUS already shot down the sampling methods he wanted to employ, in 1999, but I don't think it was ever challenged this time around.
So, if it was wrong of Obama to take that power grab, then it is even worse to give the fed gov access to much more personal and private info, isn't it?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 3676
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:05 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Like a Rock Star
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
He and the other pretend conservatives and State's rights phonies in this forum would lose their ever-loving minds if Obama did it. Look at the excuse making.HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?awesome guy wrote:VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
For a history lesson, same thing happened with the Patriot Act. Since a Republican did it and it had that magic word Patriot in the title it didn't bother any of these clowns.
What an embarrassment. This form is an anti Dem forum. It isn't conservative. Just call it what it is.
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Have to give those states credit. We shouldn't be willingly giving this information.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15753
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
The fed gubment already has every bit of that information except voting history...geez this isn't rocket surgery.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
DC and nolan - keep fighting the good fight against the federal government having access to peoples' social security numbers.
This is clear obstruction by states who know they have droves of illegal votes cast in the favor of democrat candidates. The system in California is a complete joke - one can register with no ID, no SSN, and just click a box promising ("swearsies!") they are eligible.
They aren't complying because people would lose their shirt if they saw *how little* info they had.
This is clear obstruction by states who know they have droves of illegal votes cast in the favor of democrat candidates. The system in California is a complete joke - one can register with no ID, no SSN, and just click a box promising ("swearsies!") they are eligible.
They aren't complying because people would lose their shirt if they saw *how little* info they had.
- UpstateSCHokie
- Posts: 11952
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:31 pm
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Its quite interesting how Democrats insist there is no voter fraud, but then when we ask to see proof of the integrity of our voting systems, they immediately run to block access and then say its because of "privacy." BS. They don't want people to know just how rampant this problem really is.
=======================
What Are They Hiding? Democrat State Officials Refuse to Assist President Trump’s Voter Fraud Investigation
Jim Hoft Jul 1st, 2017 8:58 am 134 Comments
Guest post by Joe Hoft
Democrat state officials in various states across the union are refusing to assist President Trump in his voter fraud investigation. Democrat politicians from California, Connecticut, Virginia and even Kentucky are not assisting in the President’s efforts to ensure US elections are fraud free:
The Gateway Pundit reported that in Detroit, Michigan, 37% of the precincts had fraudulent voting practices which were uncovered during Hillary Clinton’s recounts requested by Jill Stein. We also reported on a massive voter fraud incident in Nevada where half of the 19,000 votes in one district alone were determined to be fraudulent. Other instances in Detroit were identified during the recounts.
A study from the state of Kansas also found that there are over 7 million voter registrations that appear in two states simultaneously.
The states not providing for the President’s review are most likely guilty of allowing individuals to vote who are not eligible (e.g. illegal aliens, dead people, felons, or people from other states) or guilty of providing for other forms of Democrat voter fraud.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07 ... stigation/
=======================
What Are They Hiding? Democrat State Officials Refuse to Assist President Trump’s Voter Fraud Investigation
Jim Hoft Jul 1st, 2017 8:58 am 134 Comments
Guest post by Joe Hoft
Democrat state officials in various states across the union are refusing to assist President Trump in his voter fraud investigation. Democrat politicians from California, Connecticut, Virginia and even Kentucky are not assisting in the President’s efforts to ensure US elections are fraud free:
The officials preventing the President from ensuring the integrity of the election are no doubt the same individuals who claim the President’s accusations of voter fraud are not true.Connecticut Secretary of the State Denise Merrill said in a statement that her office would provide such information “in the spirit of transparency.” But, suggesting some of the requested data would not be sharable under state law, she said she would ensure “the privacy of voters is honored by withholding protected data.” Merrill also voiced concern that state officials “have not been told precisely what the Commission is looking for.”
Virginia and California were more brazen in their response.
McAuliffe, a former Democratic National Committee chairman and longtime Clinton family ally, said, “At best this commission was set up as a pretext to validate Donald Trump’s alternative election facts, and at worst is a tool to commit large-scale voter suppression.”
The governor declared he would not “divert resources” to this.
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla struck a similar chord, saying in a statement he would “not provide sensitive voter information to a commission that has already inaccurately passed judgment that millions of Californians voted illegally.”
He added, “California’s participation would only serve to legitimize the false and already debunked claims of massive voter fraud made by the President, the Vice President, and Mr. Kobach.”
Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes – a Democratic official in a state with a Republican governor – also said she does “not intend to release Kentuckians’ sensitive personal data to the federal government.”
“Kentucky will not aid a commission that is at best a waste of taxpayer money and at worst an attempt to legitimize voter suppression efforts across the country,” she said in a statement.
The Gateway Pundit reported that in Detroit, Michigan, 37% of the precincts had fraudulent voting practices which were uncovered during Hillary Clinton’s recounts requested by Jill Stein. We also reported on a massive voter fraud incident in Nevada where half of the 19,000 votes in one district alone were determined to be fraudulent. Other instances in Detroit were identified during the recounts.
A study from the state of Kansas also found that there are over 7 million voter registrations that appear in two states simultaneously.
The states not providing for the President’s review are most likely guilty of allowing individuals to vote who are not eligible (e.g. illegal aliens, dead people, felons, or people from other states) or guilty of providing for other forms of Democrat voter fraud.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07 ... stigation/
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” ― Voltaire (1694 – 1778)
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Florida Hokie wrote:He and the other pretend conservatives and State's rights phonies in this forum would lose their ever-loving minds if Obama did it. Look at the excuse making.HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?awesome guy wrote:VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
For a history lesson, same thing happened with the Patriot Act. Since a Republican did it and it had that magic word Patriot in the title it didn't bother any of these clowns.
What an embarrassment. This form is an anti Dem forum. It isn't conservative. Just call it what it is.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Don't forget FloHo, the 3 stooges are in on it.USN_Hokie wrote:DC and nolan - keep fighting the good fight against the federal government having access to peoples' social security numbers.
This is clear obstruction by states who know they have droves of illegal votes cast in the favor of democrat candidates. The system in California is a complete joke - one can register with no ID, no SSN, and just click a box promising ("swearsies!") they are eligible.
They aren't complying because people would lose their shirt if they saw *how little* info they had.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 3676
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:05 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Like a Rock Star
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Maybe these fellas have a point. Next the feds can collect data on ammo purchases from registered gun owners. Oh! And also library records. Internet searches. Why stop at just voting records?nolanvt wrote:Have to give those states credit. We shouldn't be willingly giving this information.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Go ahead awesome. Post your 50th post of the day about how I'm seeking attention.
Last edited by Florida Hokie on Sat Jul 01, 2017 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Yup. Ask to collect records on gun purchases and the Usuals will get back to being principled conservatives.Florida Hokie wrote:Maybe to these fellas have a point. Next the feds can collect data on ammo purchases from registered fun owners. Oh! And also library records. Internet searches. Why stop at actual voting records?nolanvt wrote:Have to give those states credit. We shouldn't be willingly giving this information.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Go ahead awesome. Post your 50th post of the day about how I'm seeking attention.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
It can never be said enough. You fools are foolish arguing that the feds can't have your SSN or address. I'm embarrassed for you.Florida Hokie wrote:Maybe these fellas have a point. Next the feds can collect data on ammo purchases from registered gun owners. Oh! And also library records. Internet searches. Why stop at just voting records?nolanvt wrote:Have to give those states credit. We shouldn't be willingly giving this information.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Go ahead awesome. Post your 50th post of the day about how I'm seeking attention.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26562
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Yes. A problem. So, what is your solution to the suspected voter fraud? How would you as Preezy go about making sure this does not happen again in a Federal election?HokieFanDC wrote:So, you are agreeing that the fed gov should not have that info?RiverguyVT wrote:Recall, his very first move as new prez was to take over the census...so...HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?awesome guy wrote:VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
It was wrong of Obama to take over the census. It was a pure move to manipulate census data to improve Dem chances of winning Congressional seats. The SCOTUS already shot down the sampling methods he wanted to employ, in 1999, but I don't think it was ever challenged this time around.
So, if it was wrong of Obama to take that power grab, then it is even worse to give the fed gov access to much more personal and private info, isn't it?
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26562
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Correct. Is the Trump admin asking for more info than that? If not, I don't see an issue. Riverguy made a good point. Much, much more info in the census questionnair.Major Kong wrote:If the state already has it then the State has it.HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
These ass clowns are arguing because of who said it (both at the presidential and message board level), not because of what was said.HokieHam wrote:Yes. A problem. So, what is your solution to the suspected voter fraud? How would you as Preezy go about making sure this does not happen again in a Federal election?HokieFanDC wrote:So, you are agreeing that the fed gov should not have that info?RiverguyVT wrote:Recall, his very first move as new prez was to take over the census...so...HokieFanDC wrote:If Obama had asked for this information on every voter - names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security information, voting history and military status, among other information - how would you react to that?awesome guy wrote:VA and CA refuse to comply with investigation into voter fraud.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=84203
It was wrong of Obama to take over the census. It was a pure move to manipulate census data to improve Dem chances of winning Congressional seats. The SCOTUS already shot down the sampling methods he wanted to employ, in 1999, but I don't think it was ever challenged this time around.
So, if it was wrong of Obama to take that power grab, then it is even worse to give the fed gov access to much more personal and private info, isn't it?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
There's a federal law forbidding databases/registries of gun owners. Your analogy is bad and you should feel bad, though - we're talking about information the government already has for every citizen. They're just asking the states to provide their sorting of it.Florida Hokie wrote:Maybe these fellas have a point. Next the feds can collect data on ammo purchases from registered gun owners. Oh! And also library records. Internet searches. Why stop at just voting records?nolanvt wrote:Have to give those states credit. We shouldn't be willingly giving this information.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Go ahead awesome. Post your 50th post of the day about how I'm seeking attention.
I might take your fake argument remotely seriously if you attacked the VRA, yet you seem to be fine with federal government meddling when the purpose is to get more democrats voting.
Better luck next time.
-
- Posts: 3676
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:05 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Like a Rock Star
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
Nobody said that. They are asking additional information like WHO YOU VOTED FOR. In addition, they are taking what is clearly defined as a State function. Of course, you clowns are centrists as long as your guy is in office.awesome guy wrote:It can never be said enough. You fools are foolish arguing that the feds can't have your SSN or address. I'm embarrassed for you.Florida Hokie wrote:Maybe these fellas have a point. Next the feds can collect data on ammo purchases from registered gun owners. Oh! And also library records. Internet searches. Why stop at just voting records?nolanvt wrote:Have to give those states credit. We shouldn't be willingly giving this information.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Go ahead awesome. Post your 50th post of the day about how I'm seeking attention.
Again, if this was requested under Obama's watch all of you defenders, without question, would be screaming from the hilltops. You are as predictable as the sunset and without an ounce of principle.
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
It's not a state function to determine if registered voters are also registered in other states. The fed has a compelling interest. I think folks would be shocked at (for example) how many college students register and vote in their home state as well as the state they go to school in. Cracking down on that shouldn't be a political issue unless your political party is endorsing it and using it as a political strategy.
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
If Obama wanted to combat election fraud I would have no problem with that.
Re: Shocking: voter fraud
I have some shocking news for our liberal friends - the political parties already know how you vote. There has been a ton of statistical science on this matter. The DNC tool in particular was lauded for the statistical accuracy it has in predicting who someone would vote for and how they could use the data to target specific people.
All your Metadata is being collected and sold to interest groups. The government is buying it too...
All your Metadata is being collected and sold to interest groups. The government is buying it too...