Free Market at work

[nolanvt]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... ech&wpmm=1


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

Uh huh. We know the reaction if they kicked You Can Play off for promoting immoral and repugnant behavior. Nice try though, your "free market" takes are always amusing as the freedom flows in just one direction.

[nolanvt]

Uh huh. We know the reaction if they kicked You Can Play off for promoting immoral and repugnant behavior. Nice try though, your "free market" takes are always amusing as the freedom flows in just one direction.

Well, they're not. I can't think of a big-name company who wouldn't host their site.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

Uh huh. We know the reaction if they kicked You Can Play off for promoting immoral and repugnant behavior. Nice try though, your "free market" takes are always amusing as the freedom flows in just one direction.

Well, they're not. I can't think of a big-name company who wouldn't host their site.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL

[nolanvt]

Uh huh. We know the reaction if they kicked You Can Play off for promoting immoral and repugnant behavior. Nice try though, your "free market" takes are always amusing as the freedom flows in just one direction.

Well, they're not. I can't think of a big-name company who wouldn't host their site.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL

But, alas, their site has been hosted since Day 1 of their organization. They're not getting booted anytime soon because of what the organization does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ip_law-hokie]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... ech&wpmm=1


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Let's hope Cap'n doesn't get UWS banned for victim blaming as well.

[awesome guy]

Uh huh. We know the reaction if they kicked You Can Play off for promoting immoral and repugnant behavior. Nice try though, your "free market" takes are always amusing as the freedom flows in just one direction.

Well, they're not. I can't think of a big-name company who wouldn't host their site.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL

But, alas, their site has been hosted since Day 1 of their organization. They're not getting booted anytime soon because of what the organization does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because only one side tries to limit speech and personally destroy the other. If only their was a word for this....

Just kidding, we know you won't know that word.

[nolanvt]

Because only one side tries to limit speech and personally destroy the other. If only their was a word for this....

Just kidding, we know you won't know that word.

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

Because only one side tries to limit speech and personally destroy the other. If only their was a word for this....

Just kidding, we know you won't know that word.

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You'd call it a crime to not want to do business with any LGBWTF group. It's a hilarious double standard.

[nolanvt]

Because only one side tries to limit speech and personally destroy the other. If only their was a word for this....

Just kidding, we know you won't know that word.

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You'd call it a crime to not want to do business with any LGBWTF group. It's a hilarious double standard.

Despite the fact that I've sided with businesses in two out of the last suits brought from gay groups. [emoji106]

You are FAKE NEWS!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[awesome guy]

Because only one side tries to limit speech and personally destroy the other. If only their was a word for this....

Just kidding, we know you won't know that word.

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You'd call it a crime to not want to do business with any LGBWTF group. It's a hilarious double standard.

Despite the fact that I've sided with businesses in two out of the last suits brought from gay groups. [emoji106]

You are FAKE NEWS!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We know your real position. You're a fake person.

[BigDave]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

[awesome guy]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent person could change course here.

[USN_Hokie]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent could change course here.

Intellectual consistency and liberals....lol.

[USN_Hokie]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/mor ... ech&wpmm=1


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Let's hope Cap'n doesn't get UWS banned for victim blaming as well.

Funny, the only one posting that material was HooFighter.

[awesome guy]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent could change course here.

Intellectual consistency and liberals....lol.

I can dream can't I?

They seem to have an instinct that once things settle down they have to go out and manufacture some chaos.

[HokieFanDC]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent person could change course here.

Not sure who "they" is, but I'm pretty sure you have argued that the baker, or photographer, or whoever, can choose to serve whoever they want. Why do you feel differently about google and dailystormer?

As for public accommodation, I don't think there is any monopoly on domain registrars. There are probably 2,000 domain registars in the country.

[awesome guy]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent person could change course here.

Not sure who "they" is, but I'm pretty sure you have argued that the baker, or photographer, or whoever, can choose to serve whoever they want. Why do you feel differently about google and dailystormer?

As for public accommodation, I don't think there is any monopoly on domain registrars. There are probably 2,000 domain registars in the country.

Customization vs. standard off the shelf.

[nolanvt]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent person could change course here.

Not sure who "they" is, but I'm pretty sure you have argued that the baker, or photographer, or whoever, can choose to serve whoever they want. Why do you feel differently about google and dailystormer?

As for public accommodation, I don't think there is any monopoly on domain registrars. There are probably 2,000 domain registars in the country.

Shhhh


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HokieFanDC]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent person could change course here.

Not sure who "they" is, but I'm pretty sure you have argued that the baker, or photographer, or whoever, can choose to serve whoever they want. Why do you feel differently about google and dailystormer?

As for public accommodation, I don't think there is any monopoly on domain registrars. There are probably 2,000 domain registars in the country.

Customization vs. standard off the shelf.

All websites are custom with regard to content.

[awesome guy]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent person could change course here.

Not sure who "they" is, but I'm pretty sure you have argued that the baker, or photographer, or whoever, can choose to serve whoever they want. Why do you feel differently about google and dailystormer?

As for public accommodation, I don't think there is any monopoly on domain registrars. There are probably 2,000 domain registars in the country.

Customization vs. standard off the shelf.

All websites are custom with regard to content.

Not at that level. It's just a registry and hosting with the customer creating the site.

[HokieJoe]

Not wanting to do business with the Daily Stormer isn't limiting their speech.

Maybe.

Do domain registrars have some sort of government-sanctioned monopoly power?

I assume most people here would agree that someone like, say, Dominion Power should not be permitted to refuse to provide service to a hate group. Dominion Power, having government-sanctioned monopoly power, is required to provide service to anyone within their territory who wants it.

If all of the government-sanctioned registrars refuse to register things they don't like, and the free market is not free to establish a competing registrar, then doesn't that amount to a government-sanctioned restraint on speech?

They're normally arguing about public accommodation. Not sure how an intellectually consistent person could change course here.

Not sure who "they" is, but I'm pretty sure you have argued that the baker, or photographer, or whoever, can choose to serve whoever they want. Why do you feel differently about google and dailystormer?

As for public accommodation, I don't think there is any monopoly on domain registrars. There are probably 2,000 domain registars in the country.

Google is certainly a monopolist in other areas though.