Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Post Reply
User avatar
USN_Hokie
Posts: 30831
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:58 pm
Party: Draintheswamp

Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by USN_Hokie »

...sex robots. First they ruin male-female relationships, now they want to ban the competition.

https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org
CWHOKIECPA
Posts: 3521
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:50 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: In your Moms mouth
Location: Mom's basement.

Re: Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by CWHOKIECPA »

USN_Hokie wrote:...sex robots. First they ruin male-female relationships, now they want to ban the competition.

https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org
What a bunch of idiots.
My women clients think I'm so sweet.
Vienna_Hokie
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:12 pm
Alma Mater: VT
Party: libertarian

Re: Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by Vienna_Hokie »

She's just angry that men would pick a hunk of metal 99 out of 100 times (I always assume there is 1 freak with a fugly fetish out there)

http://zweb-s3.uploads.s3.amazonaws.com ... 6295_o.jpg
Looks like the only thing 1984 got wrong was the date.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by awesome guy »

Vienna_Hokie wrote:She's just angry that men would pick a hunk of metal 99 out of 100 times (I always assume there is 1 freak with a fugly fetish out there)

http://zweb-s3.uploads.s3.amazonaws.com ... 6295_o.jpg

I think her issues are deeper in that she wants to nag and hen peck men even when they have 0 involvement with her. Crazy town: population her. I clicked on some of her links and the anger overflowed from the pages. They want exactly what they're accusing men of wanting, total control. Control over what the man says, how he thinks, and who or what he pops a nut in. Feminism, like liberalism, is a disease. It puts the afflicted into a mental state where they convince themselves they're the victim when they're the victimizers. A shallow excuse to treat others like crap. It's the "you deserve it" mentality. In this case, feminists have acted so hostile and confrontational towards men that they prefer an inanimate object over their affection. And now they want to sort of haunt from the grave, convincing themselves they're helping when they're adding exclamation points to the arguments to not get around them in the first place.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
CWHOKIECPA
Posts: 3521
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:50 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: In your Moms mouth
Location: Mom's basement.

Re: Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by CWHOKIECPA »

awesome guy wrote:
Vienna_Hokie wrote:She's just angry that men would pick a hunk of metal 99 out of 100 times (I always assume there is 1 freak with a fugly fetish out there)

http://zweb-s3.uploads.s3.amazonaws.com ... 6295_o.jpg

I think her issues are deeper in that she wants to nag and hen peck men even when they have 0 involvement with her. Crazy town: population her. I clicked on some of her links and the anger overflowed from the pages. They want exactly what they're accusing men of wanting, total control. Control over what the man says, how he thinks, and who or what he pops a nut in. Feminism, like liberalism, is a disease. It puts the afflicted into a mental state where they convince themselves they're the victim when they're the victimizers. A shallow excuse to treat others like crap. It's the "you deserve it" mentality. In this case, feminists have acted so hostile and confrontational towards men that they prefer an inanimate object over their affection. And now they want to sort of haunt from the grave, convincing themselves they're helping when they're adding exclamation points to the arguments to not get around them in the first place.
I agree with this. It’s all about controlling men.
My women clients think I'm so sweet.
FireFuente
Posts: 367
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:25 pm
Alma Mater: VT

Re: Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by FireFuente »

CWHOKIECPA wrote: I agree with this. It’s all about controlling men.
Yep, eliminating male-only spaces has always been a big goal of feminism.

Their anti-porn attitude is really a subtle attack on masturbation. And I'm convinced that if gay sex ever started to become the norm in the male population they would try to get that banned as well.
User avatar
HokieHam
Posts: 26562
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....

Re: Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by HokieHam »

FireFuente wrote:
CWHOKIECPA wrote: I agree with this. It’s all about controlling men.
Yep, eliminating male-only spaces has always been a big goal of feminism.

Their anti-porn attitude is really a subtle attack on masturbation. And I'm convinced that if gay sex ever started to become the norm in the male population they would try to get that banned as well.
That is the end game for leftists. Just like 1984......
Image
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."

ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
User avatar
jmac610
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:53 am

Re: Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by jmac610 »

awesome guy wrote:
Vienna_Hokie wrote:She's just angry that men would pick a hunk of metal 99 out of 100 times (I always assume there is 1 freak with a fugly fetish out there)

http://zweb-s3.uploads.s3.amazonaws.com ... 6295_o.jpg
In this case, feminists have acted so hostile and confrontational towards men that they prefer an inanimate object over their affection.
Well, with the robot you don't need a notarized consent form and it won't come back and sue you twenty years later.
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Lol, CW get in here. Feminists call for ban on....

Post by 133743Hokie »

jmac610 wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
Vienna_Hokie wrote:She's just angry that men would pick a hunk of metal 99 out of 100 times (I always assume there is 1 freak with a fugly fetish out there)

http://zweb-s3.uploads.s3.amazonaws.com ... 6295_o.jpg
In this case, feminists have acted so hostile and confrontational towards men that they prefer an inanimate object over their affection.
Well, with the robot you don't need a notarized consent form and it won't come back and sue you twenty years later.
Well, given the development of AI......
Post Reply