Any reasonable person would realize how it’s excessive.ip_law-hokie wrote:You find 5 games (next year, and appealable) and required sensitivity training to be too severe?oaktonhokie wrote:I don't know the motivation, do you?
It may have been a dumb gesture stereotyping an ethnic group.
OMG, kill him!
Mole hill.
nolanvt wrote:You seriously believe that a squinty eyes gesture at a Japanese player isn’t racist? Okie dokie then.oaktonhokie wrote:Racism?
To label that racism is hyperbole. Like micro aggression.
Everything racial isn't racist. It was insensitive.
My guess is that everyone will survive this horrible ordeal and be able to recover and lead fairly normal lives.
nolanvt wrote:FTR, I don’t necessarily think a lack of punishment under certain circumstances would be an enabling of racism, but that’s simply how it would be perceived by the public.oaktonhokie wrote:You are correct. An organization may impose discipline, fines, suspension on it's members for actions it considers in poor taste or that reflect badly on the organization. The NFL, MLB, mcdonalds or the US military if fully within their rights to do that.
The question is what is the punishment. You think that not levying a severe penalty is a tacit endorsement of racism. That is silly. I suggest that making mountains out of mole hills merely obfuscates what real racism is and puts that silly gesture on the same plane as burning a cross in someone's yard and throwing a brick through the window.
It's not.
A fine in the locker room kangaroo court of about $15 and the team saying, "What, are you nuts?" Is sufficient.
Mole hill.
Overt racism caught on national television during the World Series is more than a reasonable circumstance to discipline a player.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The five games will cost him $400k, and a portion of that will be donated to a racist organization (some sort of group that pushes diversity).
“Sensitivity training” reeks of Orwell, soviet style- a repugnant example of groupthink.