United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Oh hell NO

There certainly wont be any precedent/slippery slope from this...nope

Has anyone other than bergdahl confirmed he was held captive?

Or that he was tortured?

Or what the torture was? Maybe he was forced to listen to the national anthem every day. That would be torture to him.

CFB Apologist wrote:There certainly wont be any precedent/slippery slope from this...nope

The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

I was hoping no prison, firing squad. I guess not

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

Oh please. A judge who would put this piece of human sewage back on the street deserves to be disbarred. But in his alleged mind, he got a two-fer, blaming trump for what he was going to do anyway.

Or do you think the judge would have thrown the book at him but genuinely believes that trump caused the jury to be biased against poor little bo?

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

oaktonhokie wrote:Oh please. A judge who would put this piece of human sewage back on the street deserves to be disbarred. But in his alleged mind, he got a two-fer, blaming trump for what he was going to do anyway.

Or do you think the judge would have thrown the book at him but genuinely believes that trump caused the jury to be biased against poor little bo?

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

I don't know the context - but it is highly inappropriate for a president to comment on a pending criminal case. Amateur hour.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

oaktonhokie wrote:Oh please. A judge who would put this piece of human sewage back on the street deserves to be disbarred. But in his alleged mind, he got a two-fer, blaming trump for what he was going to do anyway.

Or do you think the judge would have thrown the book at him but genuinely believes that trump caused the jury to be biased against poor little bo?

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

I don't know the context - but it is highly inappropriate for a president to comment on a pending criminal case. Amateur hour.

On this we agree. Trump needs to lay of twitter at times- like most of the time.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

bull crap, that is an asinine judge, people effing died trying to save that sob, effing world we have now

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

bull crap, that is an asinine judge, people effing died trying to save that sob, effing world we have now

Trump screwed it up.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

No, that's on the judge. Once again a liberal judge goes outside the bounds of his pervue and makes a random decision based on his liberal bias.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

oaktonhokie wrote:Oh please. A judge who would put this piece of human sewage back on the street deserves to be disbarred. But in his alleged mind, he got a two-fer, blaming trump for what he was going to do anyway.

Or do you think the judge would have thrown the book at him but genuinely believes that trump caused the jury to be biased against poor little bo?

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

I don't know the context - but it is highly inappropriate for a president to comment on a pending criminal case. Amateur hour.

And it's even more amateurish for the decision maker to inappropriately and wrongfully consider outside opinions expressed outside his courtroom. He should be ashamed.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

bull crap, that is an asinine judge, people effing died trying to save that sob, effing world we have now

Trump screwed it up.

The short skirt made Bill Clinton rape that woman.

This was a military court with a military judge (Colonel).

My nephew is not pleased.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

No, that's on the dumbass judge. Trump’s comments have no bearing on guilt or innocence.

133743Hokie wrote:

ip_law-hokie wrote:

oaktonhokie wrote:Oh please. A judge who would put this piece of human sewage back on the street deserves to be disbarred. But in his alleged mind, he got a two-fer, blaming trump for what he was going to do anyway.

Or do you think the judge would have thrown the book at him but genuinely believes that trump caused the jury to be biased against poor little bo?

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

I don't know the context - but it is highly inappropriate for a president to comment on a pending criminal case. Amateur hour.

And it's even more amateurish for the decision maker to inappropriately and wrongfully consider outside opinions expressed outside his courtroom. He should be ashamed.

He should be demoted to a desk job in Kabul.

ip_law-hokie wrote:

oaktonhokie wrote:Oh please. A judge who would put this piece of human sewage back on the street deserves to be disbarred. But in his alleged mind, he got a two-fer, blaming trump for what he was going to do anyway.

Or do you think the judge would have thrown the book at him but genuinely believes that trump caused the jury to be biased against poor little bo?

ip_law-hokie wrote:

CFB Apologist wrote:The (Obama cuck liberal) Judge stated that Trumps public comments compelled him to give Berghdahl a lighter sentence.. no I am not making that up.

That's on Trump.

I don't know the context - but it is highly inappropriate for a president to comment on a pending criminal case. Amateur hour.

There was no jury trial. This is all on the judge.

He'd already pled guilty to all charges so there wasn't a trial...just a sentencing portion.

Now Bergdahl's attorneys are going to appeal the dishonorable discharge decision because that would be tough on the youngin'.