Keith Olbermann...
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:37 pm
Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
https://uwsboard.com/
I find that your views on this topic to be very emotion-based.cwtcr hokie wrote:oh Keith, while I agree it would be ok to have the a-hole in TX alive to ask why he was such an a-hole, that is not possible, neither is the death penalty in this situation. The New York dude is alive tho for now and once we extract any good intel from him should be run over by a truck a few hours after we get the intel.
Swift justice is what I would like, is there any question at all that the a-hole in new york murdered several humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:I find that your views on this topic to be very emotion-based.cwtcr hokie wrote:oh Keith, while I agree it would be ok to have the a-hole in TX alive to ask why he was such an a-hole, that is not possible, neither is the death penalty in this situation. The New York dude is alive tho for now and once we extract any good intel from him should be run over by a truck a few hours after we get the intel.
Nope. It's just that we have this constitution thing.cwtcr hokie wrote:Swift justice is what I would like, is there any question at all that the a-hole in new york murdered several humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:I find that your views on this topic to be very emotion-based.cwtcr hokie wrote:oh Keith, while I agree it would be ok to have the a-hole in TX alive to ask why he was such an a-hole, that is not possible, neither is the death penalty in this situation. The New York dude is alive tho for now and once we extract any good intel from him should be run over by a truck a few hours after we get the intel.
I did not say no trial, trial should last about an hour....AGAIN, is there any question at all that the a-hole that they shot while escaping his murders did not murder other humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:Nope. It's just that we have this constitution thing.cwtcr hokie wrote:Swift justice is what I would like, is there any question at all that the a-hole in new york murdered several humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:I find that your views on this topic to be very emotion-based.cwtcr hokie wrote:oh Keith, while I agree it would be ok to have the a-hole in TX alive to ask why he was such an a-hole, that is not possible, neither is the death penalty in this situation. The New York dude is alive tho for now and once we extract any good intel from him should be run over by a truck a few hours after we get the intel.
Procedural due process 101 - 1 hour is enough when it's obvious that the defendant is guilty.cwtcr hokie wrote:I did not say no trial, trial should last about an hour....AGAIN, is there any question at all that the a-hole that they shot while escaping his murders did not murder other humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:Nope. It's just that we have this constitution thing.cwtcr hokie wrote:Swift justice is what I would like, is there any question at all that the a-hole in new york murdered several humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:I find that your views on this topic to be very emotion-based.cwtcr hokie wrote:oh Keith, while I agree it would be ok to have the a-hole in TX alive to ask why he was such an a-hole, that is not possible, neither is the death penalty in this situation. The New York dude is alive tho for now and once we extract any good intel from him should be run over by a truck a few hours after we get the intel.
The part about cwtcr running him over with his truck may also have constitutional implications.HokieFanDC wrote:Procedural due process 101 - 1 hour is enough when it's obvious that the defendant is guilty.cwtcr hokie wrote:I did not say no trial, trial should last about an hour....AGAIN, is there any question at all that the a-hole that they shot while escaping his murders did not murder other humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:Nope. It's just that we have this constitution thing.cwtcr hokie wrote:Swift justice is what I would like, is there any question at all that the a-hole in new york murdered several humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:I find that your views on this topic to be very emotion-based.cwtcr hokie wrote:oh Keith, while I agree it would be ok to have the a-hole in TX alive to ask why he was such an a-hole, that is not possible, neither is the death penalty in this situation. The New York dude is alive tho for now and once we extract any good intel from him should be run over by a truck a few hours after we get the intel.
That’s incorrect.cwtcr hokie wrote:method of death matters? not really
not in our screwed up system but again the question, is there any doubt at all that the person arrested in NY for murdering people with a home depot truck on a bike path last week actually murdered other humans.... any doubt at all, even .000001 %? How long of a trial do you need?HokieFanDC wrote:Procedural due process 101 - 1 hour is enough when it's obvious that the defendant is guilty.cwtcr hokie wrote:I did not say no trial, trial should last about an hour....AGAIN, is there any question at all that the a-hole that they shot while escaping his murders did not murder other humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:Nope. It's just that we have this constitution thing.cwtcr hokie wrote:Swift justice is what I would like, is there any question at all that the a-hole in new york murdered several humans?ip_law-hokie wrote:I find that your views on this topic to be very emotion-based.cwtcr hokie wrote:oh Keith, while I agree it would be ok to have the a-hole in TX alive to ask why he was such an a-hole, that is not possible, neither is the death penalty in this situation. The New York dude is alive tho for now and once we extract any good intel from him should be run over by a truck a few hours after we get the intel.
dead is deadip_law-hokie wrote:That’s incorrect.cwtcr hokie wrote:method of death matters? not really
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And the eighth amendment is the eighth amendment.cwtcr hokie wrote:dead is deadip_law-hokie wrote:That’s incorrect.cwtcr hokie wrote:method of death matters? not really
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tell that to the folks just riding a bike on a sunny dayip_law-hokie wrote:And the eighth amendment is the eighth amendment.cwtcr hokie wrote:dead is deadip_law-hokie wrote:That’s incorrect.cwtcr hokie wrote:method of death matters? not really
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I️ understand the emotional sentiment.cwtcr hokie wrote:tell that to the folks just riding a bike on a sunny dayip_law-hokie wrote:And the eighth amendment is the eighth amendment.cwtcr hokie wrote:dead is deadip_law-hokie wrote:That’s incorrect.cwtcr hokie wrote:method of death matters? not really
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk