Louis CK is next in line....
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:36 am
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
https://uwsboard.com/
dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
Yes, but at least he's a funny d-bag.Bay_area_Hokie wrote:Louis CK, wow. Isn't he a dbag politically? Another pillar of the smarmy, egotistical left.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
ip is a victimip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How so, miles?miles wrote:ip is a victimip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How not, ip?ip_law-hokie wrote:How so, miles?miles wrote:ip is a victimip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Was just checking to see if you had a point you wanted to make. Thanks.miles wrote:How not, ip?ip_law-hokie wrote:How so, miles?miles wrote:ip is a victimip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)ip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.cwtcr hokie wrote:Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)ip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that
giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)ip_law-hokie wrote:When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.cwtcr hokie wrote:Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)ip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that
To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .
That's where defamation and slander lawsuits come into play. The problem is, you can't squeeze but so much water from a stone. If the accuser is broke then the judgement against them isn't worth the paper with the judge's signature on it.cwtcr hokie wrote:giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)
Hokie CPA wrote:That's where defamation and slander lawsuits come into play. The problem is, you can't squeeze but so much water from a stone. If the accuser is broke then the judgement against them isn't worth the paper with the judge's signature on it.cwtcr hokie wrote:giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)
Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.cwtcr hokie wrote:giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)ip_law-hokie wrote:When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.cwtcr hokie wrote:Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)ip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that
To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .
Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.[/quote]cwtcr hokie wrote:giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)ip_law-hokie wrote:When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.cwtcr hokie wrote:Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)ip_law-hokie wrote:Louis CK is a victim.cwtcr hokie wrote:dude, every man in america is next in lineHokieFanDC wrote:Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?
All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that
To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .
20 years ago? Perhaps. However, our contemporary media-driven, attention seeking culture makes me more and more skeptical of such claims. I may believe they're guilty, but I also account for the possibility that the accusers are totally FOS (see the Duke Lacrosse case). Low status + desperation means some people have nothing to lose but much to gain. Fifteen minutes of fame on Facebook or Twitter drives people to do stupid shiite.ip_law-hokie wrote:Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.
Likely getting that dollar Carville ran through the trailer park.HokieJoe wrote:20 years ago? Perhaps. However, our contemporary media-driven, attention seeking culture makes me more and more skeptical of such claims. I may believe they're guilty, but I also account for the possibility that the accusers are totally FOS (see the Duke Lacrosse case). Low status + desperation means some people have nothing to lose but much to gain. Fifteen minutes of fame on Facebook or Twitter drives people to do stupid shiite.ip_law-hokie wrote:Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.
Lol......I just read his statement.......LOOK AT MY DICK!ElbertoHokie wrote:Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.
Yep. He’ll be fine.ElbertoHokie wrote:Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.
I like how apologies are all it takes for liberal redemption, blood for conservative redemption. Aka, there's no such thing as liberal capable of forgiveness outside of their cliche. Y'all are more flimsy than a Japanese paper house.ip_law-hokie wrote:Yep. He’ll be fine.ElbertoHokie wrote:Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk