United We Stand - uwsboard.com
http://www.uwsboard.com/

Louis CK is next in line....
http://www.uwsboard.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=23707
Page 1 of 2

Author:  HokieFanDC [ Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Louis CK is next in line....

Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?

Author:  PolyTech [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

Fresh Aire with Terry Gross hardest hit.

Author:  cwtcr hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run

Author:  Bay_area_Hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

Louis CK, wow. Isn't he a dbag politically? Another pillar of the smarmy, egotistical left.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Author:  HokieJoe [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

Bay_area_Hokie wrote:
Louis CK, wow. Isn't he a dbag politically? Another pillar of the smarmy, egotistical left.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yes, but at least he's a funny d-bag.

Author:  ip_law-hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Author:  miles [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip is a victim :cry:

Author:  ip_law-hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

miles wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip is a victim :cry:


How so, miles?

Author:  miles [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

ip_law-hokie wrote:
miles wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip is a victim :cry:


How so, miles?

How not, ip?

Author:  ip_law-hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

miles wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
miles wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ip is a victim :cry:


How so, miles?

How not, ip?


Was just checking to see if you had a point you wanted to make. Thanks.

Author:  miles [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

Got it.

Author:  cwtcr hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that

Author:  ip_law-hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that


When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.

To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .

Author:  cwtcr hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that


When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.

To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .


giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)

Author:  Hokie CPA [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

cwtcr hokie wrote:
giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)


That's where defamation and slander lawsuits come into play. The problem is, you can't squeeze but so much water from a stone. If the accuser is broke then the judgement against them isn't worth the paper with the judge's signature on it.

Author:  cwtcr hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

Hokie CPA wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)


That's where defamation and slander lawsuits come into play. The problem is, you can't squeeze but so much water from a stone. If the accuser is broke then the judgement against them isn't worth the paper with the judge's signature on it.



yep, there is a risk but it is tiny, we have reached the sad point that once the accusation is made the person is guilty, I like evidence. All these people may be guilty as hell but people lie and change stories, humans are human

Author:  ip_law-hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that


When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.

To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .


giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)


Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.

Author:  cwtcr hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 1:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
HokieFanDC wrote:
Over under on how many ppl he has sexually assaulted?


dude, every man in america is next in line

All it takes is an accusation to have you fired or removed from everything you are doing, this is not a slippery slope, its an ice run


Louis CK is a victim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Did not say that, the scary part is nothing is proven on Spacey or Weinstein at this point and they have both been totally removed from everything they did, Louis CK just had his movie premiere cancelled and another show he had scuttled. Folks in Washington are saying Moore should not be running now at all. But all we have so far are accusations with no proof, words are easy thus my comment about it jumping the shark. Would you be thrilled if somebody ACCUSES you of some sex act or something, cuz in todays environment you life is screwed royally.... and you may be totally not involved or at the time it was two adults agreeing to do something (at least that is what you thought)

CK may be guilty of something, I don't know but would love to see the evidence beside she said this or that


When accusers are willing to give their name to something, I find it to be more credible. particularly when there are multiple people willing to give their names, and their stories corroborate each other.

To your point though, it does appear that Charlie Sheen may have been the "victim" of what you speak. There's people on here calling him a pervert over something that may not be true at all. But to be fair. . . .


giving your name to something does not prove anything, there is no repercussion if found much later that none of it was true, its a very dangerous road we are riding down but good luck to us and hope you don't get caught up in the nuttiness. I agree with some I have heard lately, don't even talk to the opposite sex, then no danger (unless you have a pissed off girlfriend or something)


Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.[/quote]

You do realize people lie, right? if someone says something it means nothing without some kind of proof, same as any other criminal trial. But this is not a trial, this is throw out an accusation, let it cause the damage, that achieves the goal and on to the next person.

Author:  HokieJoe [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 1:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

ip_law-hokie wrote:
Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.


20 years ago? Perhaps. However, our contemporary media-driven, attention seeking culture makes me more and more skeptical of such claims. I may believe they're guilty, but I also account for the possibility that the accusers are totally FOS (see the Duke Lacrosse case). Low status + desperation means some people have nothing to lose but much to gain. Fifteen minutes of fame on Facebook or Twitter drives people to do stupid shiite.

Author:  awesome guy [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

HokieJoe wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Lending your name does not definitively prove anything, but there are possible repercussions for the accusers if they are FOS. When multiple people lend their name, and presently acknowledge the veracity of their claims, I tend to believe them.


20 years ago? Perhaps. However, our contemporary media-driven, attention seeking culture makes me more and more skeptical of such claims. I may believe they're guilty, but I also account for the possibility that the accusers are totally FOS (see the Duke Lacrosse case). Low status + desperation means some people have nothing to lose but much to gain. Fifteen minutes of fame on Facebook or Twitter drives people to do stupid shiite.
Likely getting that dollar Carville ran through the trailer park.

Author:  nolanvt [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

Nobody tell cwtcr that Louis CK admitted these things happened.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Author:  ElbertoHokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 1:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.

Author:  HokieHam [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

ElbertoHokie wrote:
Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.

Lol......I just read his statement.......LOOK AT MY DICK!

What a magoo.......

Author:  ip_law-hokie [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

ElbertoHokie wrote:
Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.


Yep. He’ll be fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Author:  awesome guy [ Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Louis CK is next in line....

ip_law-hokie wrote:
ElbertoHokie wrote:
Louis cK with the saavyest PR move of the century. Instead of denying it and dying by slow trickle of information. He admits it, takes his beatings. And moves on and he differentiates himself from every other person playing the deny deny deny game.


Yep. He’ll be fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I like how apologies are all it takes for liberal redemption, blood for conservative redemption. Aka, there's no such thing as liberal capable of forgiveness outside of their cliche. Y'all are more flimsy than a Japanese paper house.

Page 1 of 2 Time zone: America/New_York
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/