That song is written about a drug dealer on a two-week drunk binge. Quite the high standard.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Yep, its actually a pretty recent idea that older men should NOT go for younger women. Its the result of feminazi's brainwashing young people into believing that young girls should not look for a mature man that is financially secure. And as you eluded to, its now "hip" for older women to go after younger guys. That's probably part of the reason we see these teachers praying on teenage boys these days.awesome guy wrote:H2 and Nolan are appalled that a man would be the bread winner and would initiate a relationship with a woman. They live in the age of 30 year old men being chased by 40 year old women looking for a sperm donor before their couter dries up. The idea of older men seeking younger people, much less women, is foreign and ichy to them.UpstateSCHokie wrote:
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
But I'm reminded of the lyrics of an old Jimmy Buffet song:
But nobody that that was wrong or "creepy" when the song came out.I go for younger women, lived with several a while
Though I ran them away, they'd come back one day
Still could manage to smile
Just takes a while, just takes a while
BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Leaders
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
Only drug dealers sought younger women, got it.ip_law-hokie wrote:That song is written about a drug dealer on a two-week drunk binge. Quite the high standard.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Yep, its actually a pretty recent idea that older men should NOT go for younger women. Its the result of feminazi's brainwashing young people into believing that young girls should not look for a mature man that is financially secure. And as you eluded to, its now "hip" for older women to go after younger guys. That's probably part of the reason we see these teachers praying on teenage boys these days.awesome guy wrote:H2 and Nolan are appalled that a man would be the bread winner and would initiate a relationship with a woman. They live in the age of 30 year old men being chased by 40 year old women looking for a sperm donor before their couter dries up. The idea of older men seeking younger people, much less women, is foreign and ichy to them.UpstateSCHokie wrote:
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
But I'm reminded of the lyrics of an old Jimmy Buffet song:
But nobody that that was wrong or "creepy" when the song came out.I go for younger women, lived with several a while
Though I ran them away, they'd come back one day
Still could manage to smile
Just takes a while, just takes a while
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
16 is the age of consent.TheH2 wrote:UpstateSCHokie wrote:I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.TheH2 wrote:He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.cwtcr hokie wrote:sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easyUpstateSCHokie wrote:Yup, dirty tricks just as I expected. I'm going to go ahead and conclude this lie has been debunked.
https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
Uppity brought it up. Take it up with him.awesome guy wrote:Only drug dealers sought younger women, got it.ip_law-hokie wrote:That song is written about a drug dealer on a two-week drunk binge. Quite the high standard.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Yep, its actually a pretty recent idea that older men should NOT go for younger women. Its the result of feminazi's brainwashing young people into believing that young girls should not look for a mature man that is financially secure. And as you eluded to, its now "hip" for older women to go after younger guys. That's probably part of the reason we see these teachers praying on teenage boys these days.awesome guy wrote:H2 and Nolan are appalled that a man would be the bread winner and would initiate a relationship with a woman. They live in the age of 30 year old men being chased by 40 year old women looking for a sperm donor before their couter dries up. The idea of older men seeking younger people, much less women, is foreign and ichy to them.UpstateSCHokie wrote:
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
But I'm reminded of the lyrics of an old Jimmy Buffet song:
But nobody that that was wrong or "creepy" when the song came out.I go for younger women, lived with several a while
Though I ran them away, they'd come back one day
Still could manage to smile
Just takes a while, just takes a while
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
Is this an area in which you expect from your politicians "just barely" meeting the minimum standard of consent to avoid statutory rape? If so, I bet there is a Danville in Alabama, AG, because it's apparently your sort of place.awesome guy wrote:16 is the age of consent.TheH2 wrote:UpstateSCHokie wrote:I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.TheH2 wrote:He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.cwtcr hokie wrote:sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easyUpstateSCHokie wrote:Yup, dirty tricks just as I expected. I'm going to go ahead and conclude this lie has been debunked.
https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....awesome guy wrote:16 is the age of consent.TheH2 wrote:UpstateSCHokie wrote:I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.TheH2 wrote:He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.cwtcr hokie wrote:sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easyUpstateSCHokie wrote:Yup, dirty tricks just as I expected. I'm going to go ahead and conclude this lie has been debunked.
https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".
People who know, know.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
It's a bright line. I like how you think Danville is an insult.ip_law-hokie wrote:Is this an area in which you expect from your politicians "just barely" meeting the minimum standard of consent to avoid statutory rape? If so, I bet there is a Danville in Alabama, AG, because it's apparently your sort of place.awesome guy wrote:16 is the age of consent.TheH2 wrote:UpstateSCHokie wrote:I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.TheH2 wrote:He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.cwtcr hokie wrote: sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easy
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/[/quote]
sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easy[/quote]
He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.[/quote]
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.[/quote]
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".[/quote]16 is the age of consent.[/quote]
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....[/quote]
We know it was common knowledge that he dated teenagers. And we know that there is an accuser (14), and a mother who describe a meeting with Roy, and who reference a custody hearing on a certain date that matches the time frame. the story told by the accuser (14) matches the sort of behavior (sharing alcohol - taking back to his house) that the other, slightly older girls with whom - from his admission - it seems likely he was with. (To my knowledge he as only denied knowing the 14 year old.)
To cwtcr's credit - I would not be able to convict someone on this evidence if I was serving on a jury. The accuser turned about to be (from all appearances) a meth head or some other sort of low life.
But, I think I would be able to factor it in if I were voting for my senator.
sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easy[/quote]
He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.[/quote]
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.[/quote]
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".[/quote]16 is the age of consent.[/quote]
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....[/quote]
We know it was common knowledge that he dated teenagers. And we know that there is an accuser (14), and a mother who describe a meeting with Roy, and who reference a custody hearing on a certain date that matches the time frame. the story told by the accuser (14) matches the sort of behavior (sharing alcohol - taking back to his house) that the other, slightly older girls with whom - from his admission - it seems likely he was with. (To my knowledge he as only denied knowing the 14 year old.)
To cwtcr's credit - I would not be able to convict someone on this evidence if I was serving on a jury. The accuser turned about to be (from all appearances) a meth head or some other sort of low life.
But, I think I would be able to factor it in if I were voting for my senator.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
He did it old school, by asking permission from the parents first. I'd think a lot more of someone like him being inclusive with the family than someone like a lot of your peers that think family is irrelevant.TheH2 wrote:We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....awesome guy wrote:16 is the age of consent.TheH2 wrote:UpstateSCHokie wrote:I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.TheH2 wrote:He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.cwtcr hokie wrote: sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easy
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/[/quote]
sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easy[/quote]
He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.[/quote]
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.[/quote]
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".[/quote]16 is the age of consent.[/quote]
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....[/quote]He did it old school, by asking permission from the parents first. I'd think a lot more of someone like him being inclusive with the family than someone like a lot of your peers that think family is irrelevant.[/quote]
That's a fair point. but I would be bothered by the fact that the mother currently backs the accuser's story. They've stood behind the article 100%. That evidence supports the notion that the mother would have known, and she did.
sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easy[/quote]
He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.[/quote]
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.[/quote]
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".[/quote]16 is the age of consent.[/quote]
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....[/quote]He did it old school, by asking permission from the parents first. I'd think a lot more of someone like him being inclusive with the family than someone like a lot of your peers that think family is irrelevant.[/quote]
That's a fair point. but I would be bothered by the fact that the mother currently backs the accuser's story. They've stood behind the article 100%. That evidence supports the notion that the mother would have known, and she did.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
Like I said, he's a real gentleman. "He's the last true family man."awesome guy wrote:He did it old school, by asking permission from the parents first. I'd think a lot more of someone like him being inclusive with the family than someone like a lot of your peers that think family is irrelevant.
People who know, know.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
It's baffling to me why anybody would want him to run. He drops out and tells everyone to write in Strange, and everything goes on as normal.TheH2 wrote:Like I said, he's a real gentleman. "He's the last true family man."awesome guy wrote:He did it old school, by asking permission from the parents first. I'd think a lot more of someone like him being inclusive with the family than someone like a lot of your peers that think family is irrelevant.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
I get it that you're mocking him, but he did follow the old ways.TheH2 wrote:Like I said, he's a real gentleman. "He's the last true family man."awesome guy wrote:He did it old school, by asking permission from the parents first. I'd think a lot more of someone like him being inclusive with the family than someone like a lot of your peers that think family is irrelevant.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
ip_law-hokie wrote:That song is written about a drug dealer on a two-week drunk binge. Quite the high standard.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Yep, its actually a pretty recent idea that older men should NOT go for younger women. Its the result of feminazi's brainwashing young people into believing that young girls should not look for a mature man that is financially secure. And as you eluded to, its now "hip" for older women to go after younger guys. That's probably part of the reason we see these teachers praying on teenage boys these days.awesome guy wrote:H2 and Nolan are appalled that a man would be the bread winner and would initiate a relationship with a woman. They live in the age of 30 year old men being chased by 40 year old women looking for a sperm donor before their couter dries up. The idea of older men seeking younger people, much less women, is foreign and ichy to them.UpstateSCHokie wrote:
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
But I'm reminded of the lyrics of an old Jimmy Buffet song:
But nobody that that was wrong or "creepy" when the song came out.I go for younger women, lived with several a while
Though I ran them away, they'd come back one day
Still could manage to smile
Just takes a while, just takes a while
Meh, dating teenagers isn't my thing, but to suggest that the practice is exclusive to Alabama, necks or evangelicals is wrong. In fact, Jerry Seinfeld would like to have a word with you.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
Yes, but it's usually universally condemned. Woody Allen is not on the ticket in NY.HokieJoe wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:That song is written about a drug dealer on a two-week drunk binge. Quite the high standard.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Yep, its actually a pretty recent idea that older men should NOT go for younger women. Its the result of feminazi's brainwashing young people into believing that young girls should not look for a mature man that is financially secure. And as you eluded to, its now "hip" for older women to go after younger guys. That's probably part of the reason we see these teachers praying on teenage boys these days.awesome guy wrote:H2 and Nolan are appalled that a man would be the bread winner and would initiate a relationship with a woman. They live in the age of 30 year old men being chased by 40 year old women looking for a sperm donor before their couter dries up. The idea of older men seeking younger people, much less women, is foreign and ichy to them.UpstateSCHokie wrote:
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
But I'm reminded of the lyrics of an old Jimmy Buffet song:
But nobody that that was wrong or "creepy" when the song came out.I go for younger women, lived with several a while
Though I ran them away, they'd come back one day
Still could manage to smile
Just takes a while, just takes a while
Meh, dating teenagers isn't my thing, but to suggest that the practice is exclusive to Alabama, necks or evangelicals is wrong. In fact, Jerry Seinfeld would like to have a word with you.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
ip_law-hokie wrote:Yes, but it's usually universally condemned. Woody Allen is not on the ticket in NY.HokieJoe wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:That song is written about a drug dealer on a two-week drunk binge. Quite the high standard.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Yep, its actually a pretty recent idea that older men should NOT go for younger women. Its the result of feminazi's brainwashing young people into believing that young girls should not look for a mature man that is financially secure. And as you eluded to, its now "hip" for older women to go after younger guys. That's probably part of the reason we see these teachers praying on teenage boys these days.awesome guy wrote:H2 and Nolan are appalled that a man would be the bread winner and would initiate a relationship with a woman. They live in the age of 30 year old men being chased by 40 year old women looking for a sperm donor before their couter dries up. The idea of older men seeking younger people, much less women, is foreign and ichy to them.UpstateSCHokie wrote:
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
But I'm reminded of the lyrics of an old Jimmy Buffet song:
But nobody that that was wrong or "creepy" when the song came out.I go for younger women, lived with several a while
Though I ran them away, they'd come back one day
Still could manage to smile
Just takes a while, just takes a while
Meh, dating teenagers isn't my thing, but to suggest that the practice is exclusive to Alabama, necks or evangelicals is wrong. In fact, Jerry Seinfeld would like to have a word with you.
I think looked down upon is more accurate. And Woody was a whole other kettle of fish. Like cats wouldn't touch it.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
Woody Allen is another Bill Clinton style case. Liberals and Yankees(pardon my redundancy) will accept any sin from a liberal and 0 from a conservative. If Moore switched parties then pesto, it's acceptable to the left. These are the same people whose most senior and respected senator was a klansman, all while they were calling the right racists. Their only value is power, everything else can be sacrificed for power.HokieJoe wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:Yes, but it's usually universally condemned. Woody Allen is not on the ticket in NY.HokieJoe wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:That song is written about a drug dealer on a two-week drunk binge. Quite the high standard.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Yep, its actually a pretty recent idea that older men should NOT go for younger women. Its the result of feminazi's brainwashing young people into believing that young girls should not look for a mature man that is financially secure. And as you eluded to, its now "hip" for older women to go after younger guys. That's probably part of the reason we see these teachers praying on teenage boys these days.awesome guy wrote:H2 and Nolan are appalled that a man would be the bread winner and would initiate a relationship with a woman. They live in the age of 30 year old men being chased by 40 year old women looking for a sperm donor before their couter dries up. The idea of older men seeking younger people, much less women, is foreign and ichy to them.
But I'm reminded of the lyrics of an old Jimmy Buffet song:
But nobody that that was wrong or "creepy" when the song came out.I go for younger women, lived with several a while
Though I ran them away, they'd come back one day
Still could manage to smile
Just takes a while, just takes a while
Meh, dating teenagers isn't my thing, but to suggest that the practice is exclusive to Alabama, necks or evangelicals is wrong. In fact, Jerry Seinfeld would like to have a word with you.
I think looked down upon is more accurate. And Woody was a whole other kettle of fish. Like cats wouldn't touch it.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
17 plus is frowned upon. I believe 14 is universally rape.HokieJoe wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:Yes, but it's usually universally condemned. Woody Allen is not on the ticket in NY.HokieJoe wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:That song is written about a drug dealer on a two-week drunk binge. Quite the high standard.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Yep, its actually a pretty recent idea that older men should NOT go for younger women. Its the result of feminazi's brainwashing young people into believing that young girls should not look for a mature man that is financially secure. And as you eluded to, its now "hip" for older women to go after younger guys. That's probably part of the reason we see these teachers praying on teenage boys these days.awesome guy wrote:H2 and Nolan are appalled that a man would be the bread winner and would initiate a relationship with a woman. They live in the age of 30 year old men being chased by 40 year old women looking for a sperm donor before their couter dries up. The idea of older men seeking younger people, much less women, is foreign and ichy to them.
But I'm reminded of the lyrics of an old Jimmy Buffet song:
But nobody that that was wrong or "creepy" when the song came out.I go for younger women, lived with several a while
Though I ran them away, they'd come back one day
Still could manage to smile
Just takes a while, just takes a while
Meh, dating teenagers isn't my thing, but to suggest that the practice is exclusive to Alabama, necks or evangelicals is wrong. In fact, Jerry Seinfeld would like to have a word with you.
I think looked down upon is more accurate. And Woody was a whole other kettle of fish. Like cats wouldn't touch it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easy[/quote]ip_law-hokie wrote:https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/
He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.[/quote]
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.[/quote]
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".[/quote]16 is the age of consent.[/quote]
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....[/quote]
We know it was common knowledge that he dated teenagers. And we know that there is an accuser (14), and a mother who describe a meeting with Roy, and who reference a custody hearing on a certain date that matches the time frame. the story told by the accuser (14) matches the sort of behavior (sharing alcohol - taking back to his house) that the other, slightly older girls with whom - from his admission - it seems likely he was with. (To my knowledge he as only denied knowing the 14 year old.)
To cwtcr's credit - I would not be able to convict someone on this evidence if I was serving on a jury. The accuser turned about to be (from all appearances) a meth head or some other sort of low life.
But, I think I would be able to factor it in if I were voting for my senator.[/quote]
so if the person you like in the race is accused of some crime with zero evidence you just assume that person is guilty? really? wow
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.cwtcr hokie wrote:sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easyip_law-hokie wrote:https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.[/quote]
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.[/quote]
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".[/quote]16 is the age of consent.[/quote]
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....[/quote]
We know it was common knowledge that he dated teenagers. And we know that there is an accuser (14), and a mother who describe a meeting with Roy, and who reference a custody hearing on a certain date that matches the time frame. the story told by the accuser (14) matches the sort of behavior (sharing alcohol - taking back to his house) that the other, slightly older girls with whom - from his admission - it seems likely he was with. (To my knowledge he as only denied knowing the 14 year old.)
To cwtcr's credit - I would not be able to convict someone on this evidence if I was serving on a jury. The accuser turned about to be (from all appearances) a meth head or some other sort of low life.
But, I think I would be able to factor it in if I were voting for my senator.[/quote]
so if the person you like in the race is accused of some crime with zero evidence you just assume that person is guilty? really? wow[/quote]
I wouldn't call it zero evidence.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/p ... v=top-news
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
#ChristianValuesawesome guy wrote:I get it that you're mocking him, but he did follow the old ways.TheH2 wrote:Like I said, he's a real gentleman. "He's the last true family man."awesome guy wrote:He did it old school, by asking permission from the parents first. I'd think a lot more of someone like him being inclusive with the family than someone like a lot of your peers that think family is irrelevant.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.ip_law-hokie wrote:He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.cwtcr hokie wrote:sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easyip_law-hokie wrote:https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.[/quote]
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".[/quote]16 is the age of consent.[/quote]
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....[/quote]
We know it was common knowledge that he dated teenagers. And we know that there is an accuser (14), and a mother who describe a meeting with Roy, and who reference a custody hearing on a certain date that matches the time frame. the story told by the accuser (14) matches the sort of behavior (sharing alcohol - taking back to his house) that the other, slightly older girls with whom - from his admission - it seems likely he was with. (To my knowledge he as only denied knowing the 14 year old.)
To cwtcr's credit - I would not be able to convict someone on this evidence if I was serving on a jury. The accuser turned about to be (from all appearances) a meth head or some other sort of low life.
But, I think I would be able to factor it in if I were voting for my senator.[/quote]
so if the person you like in the race is accused of some crime with zero evidence you just assume that person is guilty? really? wow[/quote]
I wouldn't call it zero evidence.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/p ... v=top-news[/quote]
what evidence, a verbal accusation..... ok, you banged a 10 year old last year... hey, you did it, right?
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
If you get 4 more people, corroborating evidence and Gloria Allred, you may be on to something cwtcr. Good luck.cwtcr hokie wrote:I see, so we're back to looking historical events through today's moral compass? Psst, here's a clue. Back in the 60's and early 70's, it was not that uncommon for older men to go for much younger girls. If a girl was 18, she was fair game and people didn't have a problem with it.ip_law-hokie wrote:He didn't deny dating h.s. girls when he was in his 30s, so that's kind of obvious now.cwtcr hokie wrote:sorry MSM but actual proof is needed before I decide who is lying, so show it to me. Words are easyip_law-hokie wrote:https://activistmommy.com/breaking-roy- ... -opponent/
He did deny the allegations by the 14yo.
And on top of that, younger girls chased older men because they would be more financially secure then men their own age and back then, 18 y/o girls were looking to get married. Unlike today where women want to get through college and have a career before they settle down and have kids.
Nothing wrong with going after younger WOMAN. This is a false equivalence. Again, we're not just talking about 18, but younger. Maybe his campaign slogan should be "if there's grass on the field play ball".[/quote]16 is the age of consent.[/quote]
We don't know that 16 was the magic number for him. We do know that he dated h.s. girls, that's about it. We do know that if any 32yo tried to pick up our daughter we'd not think too highly of him. Or, maybe you would.....[/quote]
We know it was common knowledge that he dated teenagers. And we know that there is an accuser (14), and a mother who describe a meeting with Roy, and who reference a custody hearing on a certain date that matches the time frame. the story told by the accuser (14) matches the sort of behavior (sharing alcohol - taking back to his house) that the other, slightly older girls with whom - from his admission - it seems likely he was with. (To my knowledge he as only denied knowing the 14 year old.)
To cwtcr's credit - I would not be able to convict someone on this evidence if I was serving on a jury. The accuser turned about to be (from all appearances) a meth head or some other sort of low life.
But, I think I would be able to factor it in if I were voting for my senator.[/quote]
so if the person you like in the race is accused of some crime with zero evidence you just assume that person is guilty? really? wow[/quote]
I wouldn't call it zero evidence.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/p ... v=top-news[/quote]
what evidence, a verbal accusation..... ok, you banged a 10 year old last year... hey, you did it, right?[/quote]
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:24 pm
- Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
- Party: Independent
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
Fantastic guy. He'd been banned from a mall in Alabama for years after badgering teen girls. Sounds amazing.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: BREAKING! Roy Moore’s Accuser Worked for Democratic Lead
My money would be on him winning.ElbertoHokie wrote:Fantastic guy. He'd been banned from a mall in Alabama for years after badgering teen girls. Sounds amazing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.