United We Stand - uwsboard.com

that it means whatever a an alleged victim wants it to mean. It is about to become as meaningless as the term, racist.

Repeatedly asking a girl on a date… Sexual harassment?
Complementing a woman on her clothes… Sexual harassment?

Should a woman call the police if while walking down the street, someone says, “Hey babe, nice butt.”

Sexual harassment is serious and it needs to be taken seriously. But every offense even a crude one is not the time for weepy press conferences and police.

The term needs to be defined. Or, like the term racism, it will dissolve and two meaninglessness..

All depends on the political affiliation of the accused. Means rape and xenophobia if a Republican, temporary lapse in a quest for gender equality if a Democrat.

[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nolanvt wrote:[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

not sure why you post that as the allegations are all over the board, best idea appears to be do not be within 50 feet of the opposite sex and do not talk or make eye contact with them. And of course if you do touch them at all have a signed contract in force. And of course when the ladies go our in revealing clothes to make sure you do not look at them

cwtcr hokie wrote:

nolanvt wrote:[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

not sure why you post that as the allegations are all over the board, best idea appears to be do not be within 50 feet of the opposite sex and do not talk or make eye contact with them. And of course if you do touch them at all have a signed contract in force. And of course when the ladies go our in revealing clothes to make sure you do not look at them

It's Nolan's primal scream, like a monkey howling as a new face approaches his cage at the zoo. Nothing to it, it's just noise.

cwtcr hokie wrote:

nolanvt wrote:[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

not sure why you post that as the allegations are all over the board, best idea appears to be do not be within 50 feet of the opposite sex and do not talk or make eye contact with them. And of course if you do touch them at all have a signed contract in force. And of course when the ladies go our in revealing clothes to make sure you do not look at them

Looking at a woman in revealing clothes is not sexual harassment.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nolanvt wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

nolanvt wrote:[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

not sure why you post that as the allegations are all over the board, best idea appears to be do not be within 50 feet of the opposite sex and do not talk or make eye contact with them. And of course if you do touch them at all have a signed contract in force. And of course when the ladies go our in revealing clothes to make sure you do not look at them

Looking at a woman in revealing clothes is not sexual harassment.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually you are wrong, just looking at someone can bring a harassment claim if the other person is feeling uncomfortable, thus the point of the original post

cwtcr hokie wrote:

nolanvt wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

nolanvt wrote:[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

not sure why you post that as the allegations are all over the board, best idea appears to be do not be within 50 feet of the opposite sex and do not talk or make eye contact with them. And of course if you do touch them at all have a signed contract in force. And of course when the ladies go our in revealing clothes to make sure you do not look at them

Looking at a woman in revealing clothes is not sexual harassment.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually you are wrong, just looking at someone can bring a harassment claim if the other person is feeling uncomfortable, thus the point of the original post

LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually he's correct. Looking at a woman in revealing clothing in the workplace can certainly be construed as sexual harassment. All it takes is for her to complain that you've been looking at her too long and she thinks you're creepy.

nolanvt wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

nolanvt wrote:

cwtcr hokie wrote:

nolanvt wrote:[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

not sure why you post that as the allegations are all over the board, best idea appears to be do not be within 50 feet of the opposite sex and do not talk or make eye contact with them. And of course if you do touch them at all have a signed contract in force. And of course when the ladies go our in revealing clothes to make sure you do not look at them

Looking at a woman in revealing clothes is not sexual harassment.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually you are wrong, just looking at someone can bring a harassment claim if the other person is feeling uncomfortable, thus the point of the original post

LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's like 'social justice'. It means whatever you want it to mean.