Uh huhHokieFanDC wrote:LOL. Keep sticking with the 20% of reserves claim. Please, say it again. It's funnier the more you say things that are completely wrong.awesome guy wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough for today?awesome guy wrote:And that's the surrender flag.TheH2 wrote:You're fake factsawesome guy wrote:
Fine, but it wasn't 20% of reserves, that's an indisputable fact. Please, by all means, resort to insults but that doesn't change the fact that you're wrong, again. Or, form your opinions on your alternative facts and assume you're right.
If it's $hit came out, then I suppose that it's $hit went in.
You mean uranium one is BS
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30322
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
So, you're saying Hillary!'s foundation did in fact take money for this deal?TheH2 wrote:Fact, Uranium is a commodity that is traded, there is even a traded price. Mined uranium is not going to blow anyone up. Hell, it can't even be used in nuclear reactors. It is not suitable for nuclear weapons until it is enriched to 90%, maybe 96/97% (google to verify). It's really difficult to get that last few percent. Iran had likely not yet achieved it prior to the nuclear deal.RiverguyVT wrote:Fingers in ears...nah! nah! nah! .... Hillary!'s foundation took no money (because the amount reported is wrong)
Uranium is swapped around just like corn.
Uh, yeah. ....No.
Never said Hillary took no money, but carry on with not valid points to make your point.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
I'm not disputing the fact that the Clinton foundation took money from people. I don't know that it has anything to do with the deal.RiverguyVT wrote:So, you're saying Hillary!'s foundation did in fact take money for this deal?TheH2 wrote:Fact, Uranium is a commodity that is traded, there is even a traded price. Mined uranium is not going to blow anyone up. Hell, it can't even be used in nuclear reactors. It is not suitable for nuclear weapons until it is enriched to 90%, maybe 96/97% (google to verify). It's really difficult to get that last few percent. Iran had likely not yet achieved it prior to the nuclear deal.RiverguyVT wrote:Fingers in ears...nah! nah! nah! .... Hillary!'s foundation took no money (because the amount reported is wrong)
Uranium is swapped around just like corn.
Uh, yeah. ....No.
Never said Hillary took no money, but carry on with not valid points to make your point.
I'm suspicious for a few reasons:
The "facts" cited to make the case were wrong. See ag's 20%. That should call this into question. Let the facts speak for themselves, when discredited, don't continue to run with them.
I don't see why IEA or any other agency wouldn't approve the deal. This isn't a national security threat.
Boy who cried wolf.
People who know, know.
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
The last word, by ag.
awesome guy wrote:Uh huh
People who know, know.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
Danville.TheH2 wrote:The last word, by ag.awesome guy wrote:Uh huh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
I had the first and best ones tooTheH2 wrote:The last word, by ag.awesome guy wrote:Uh huh
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
That's not fair. Tunstall Sr. High has produced some terrific graduates. There's a lot of good in Danville.ip_law-hokie wrote:Danville.TheH2 wrote:The last word, by ag.awesome guy wrote:Uh huh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
Uh huhHokieFanDC wrote:That's not fair. Tunstall Sr. High has produced some terrific graduates. There's a lot of good in Danville.ip_law-hokie wrote:Danville.TheH2 wrote:The last word, by ag.awesome guy wrote:Uh huh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
No, questioning why it's a strategic asset whose use should be strictly controlled is what screams LIV.HokieFanDC wrote:The "20% of the reserve" claim is the flashing neon sign that screams "I'm a LIV".TheH2 wrote:It's not 20% of reserves. It was estimated at 20% of licensed capacity, which is far different from reserves. Again, please use actual facts, not AG facts. In 2015 it was less than 5% of U.S. production, a trivial amount.awesome guy wrote:The US may be legally denied access to it's uranium during war. It's 20% of the reserve and not trivial as you falsely assert.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
I didn't question that goofball.HokieJoe wrote:No, questioning why it's a strategic asset whose use should be strictly controlled is what screams LIV.HokieFanDC wrote:The "20% of the reserve" claim is the flashing neon sign that screams "I'm a LIV".TheH2 wrote:It's not 20% of reserves. It was estimated at 20% of licensed capacity, which is far different from reserves. Again, please use actual facts, not AG facts. In 2015 it was less than 5% of U.S. production, a trivial amount.awesome guy wrote:The US may be legally denied access to it's uranium during war. It's 20% of the reserve and not trivial as you falsely assert.
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
Questioning something doesn't make someone LIV, seems like the opposite would be true. I've provided some information that questions whether it is really a strategic asset. It seems your response, if it's so obvious, should be a little more than because because because because because.......HokieJoe wrote:No, questioning why it's a strategic asset whose use should be strictly controlled is what screams LIV.HokieFanDC wrote:The "20% of the reserve" claim is the flashing neon sign that screams "I'm a LIV".TheH2 wrote:It's not 20% of reserves. It was estimated at 20% of licensed capacity, which is far different from reserves. Again, please use actual facts, not AG facts. In 2015 it was less than 5% of U.S. production, a trivial amount.awesome guy wrote:The US may be legally denied access to it's uranium during war. It's 20% of the reserve and not trivial as you falsely assert.
People who know, know.
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
HokieFanDC wrote:I didn't question that goofball.HokieJoe wrote:No, questioning why it's a strategic asset whose use should be strictly controlled is what screams LIV.HokieFanDC wrote:The "20% of the reserve" claim is the flashing neon sign that screams "I'm a LIV".TheH2 wrote:It's not 20% of reserves. It was estimated at 20% of licensed capacity, which is far different from reserves. Again, please use actual facts, not AG facts. In 2015 it was less than 5% of U.S. production, a trivial amount.awesome guy wrote:The US may be legally denied access to it's uranium during war. It's 20% of the reserve and not trivial as you falsely assert.
Sorry, that wasn't directed at you.
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: You mean uranium one is BS
A Ok.HokieJoe wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:I didn't question that goofball.HokieJoe wrote:No, questioning why it's a strategic asset whose use should be strictly controlled is what screams LIV.HokieFanDC wrote:The "20% of the reserve" claim is the flashing neon sign that screams "I'm a LIV".TheH2 wrote:It's not 20% of reserves. It was estimated at 20% of licensed capacity, which is far different from reserves. Again, please use actual facts, not AG facts. In 2015 it was less than 5% of U.S. production, a trivial amount.awesome guy wrote:The US may be legally denied access to it's uranium during war. It's 20% of the reserve and not trivial as you falsely assert.
Sorry, that wasn't directed at you.