United We Stand - uwsboard.com

Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
It is currently Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:00 pm

Time zone: America/New_York


UWS DWF UWS Lunch UWS Sports UWS Help TSL Football TSL Lounge TSL MBB Acronyms Top 25 Topics


Forum rules


Please be civil.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8850
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31376
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 6:42 pm
Posts: 824
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


On one hand, it's a terrible ruling.

On the other hand, the results of the "ban" will demonstrate how utterly useless, at best, and utterly deadly to innocent citizens, at worst, any "ban" is...

Sadly, people like ip will not learn a thing from it...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?


Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31376
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?


Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.
Cracker Jack box?

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?


Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.
Cracker Jack box?


so the 4th circuit is a bunch of morans?

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31376
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
[quote="ip_law-hokie"]Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?


Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.
Cracker Jack box?


so the 4th circuit is a bunch of morans?[/quote]They are on this case, your style of tyranny.

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/[/quote]

Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god[/quote]

I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Where did you get your law degree?[/quote]

Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.[/quote]Cracker Jack box?[/quote]

so the 4th circuit is a bunch of morans?[/quote]They are on this case, your style of tyranny.[/quote]

got it.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts: 5482
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.

_________________
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:29 pm
Posts: 6041
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.

....and secede from the union.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 6:42 pm
Posts: 824
133743Hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.

....and secede from the union.


...and establish their own bathroom rules and opt out of socialized health care plan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 6:42 pm
Posts: 824
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/


Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god


I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Except for single payer health care, right? That would like to ram down everyone's throats...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts: 5482
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.

_________________
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8850
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



you are getting killed with your hypocrisy, you may just want to move on. As others have rightly pointed out, the rules are for all the nation but lets adjust for certain spots....not a plan that will end in good consequences.

Never mind that criminals already break lots of laws, making another one will not stop a single criminal act


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 8850
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.


unless it involves baking a cake for someone, then the gov. has to use force


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.


Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31376
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.


Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



you are getting killed with your hypocrisy, you may just want to move on. As others have rightly pointed out, the rules are for all the nation but lets adjust for certain spots....not a plan that will end in good consequences.

Never mind that criminals already break lots of laws, making another one will not stop a single criminal act


you don't seem to understand federalism, or the notion that some things are permitted (or not permitted) in some places, and not permitted (or permitted) in others. for example, Massachusetts has a form of "free" single payer health care. that's a good thing.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts: 5482
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?


Because IP doesn't like it.

IP, what exactly do you think a semi-automatic weapon is?

Semi-automatic only means that you don't have to re-cock it before shooting again. We're not talking about machine guns.

_________________
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.


Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?


Because I value the ability of a locality to ban semi-automatic weapons over the right of citizen who chooses to live in that locality to own a semi-automatic weapon.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 10206
Location: New York, NY
BigDave wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?


Because IP doesn't like it.

IP, what exactly do you think a semi-automatic weapon is?

Semi-automatic only means that you don't have to re-cock it before shooting again. We're not talking about machine guns.


OK. Still OK with it.

_________________
"Leadership: Whatever happens, you're responsible. If it doesn't happen, you're responsible." - DT(2013)

"We're not going to own it. I'm not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it." - DT(2017)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:10 pm
Posts: 31376
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Party: After 10
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
[quote="ip_law-hokie"]I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.


In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.


Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?


Because I value the ability of a locality to ban semi-automatic weapons over the right of citizen who chooses to live in that locality to own a semi-automatic weapon.[/quote]Regardless of what the constitution says. Got it

_________________
You losers lost, take off the vagina suit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Time zone: America/New_York


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: