Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
https://uwsboard.com/
I have no idea.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
Depends what is is.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
He definitely did, but Trump isn’t a Bible thumper and his image is one where you wouldn’t be surprised by it.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
Besides Trump of course, is there a candidate one could have supported while still maintaining integrity?USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
Not one on the ballot. I new what McMuffin was the second I started hearing about him.ip_law-hokie wrote:Besides Trump of course, is there a candidate one could have supported while still maintaining integrity?USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I should let USN answer, but I expect he would agree.HokieHam wrote:Not one on the ballot. I new what McMuffin was the second I started hearing about him.ip_law-hokie wrote:Besides Trump of course, is there a candidate one could have supported while still maintaining integrity?USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wrote in Rand Paul. I’m glad Trump won.
And you 100% know for sure that he did how? Again, as I asked the poster Once and he/she could NEVER explain how they knew for sure, please explain how you know for surenolanvt wrote:He definitely did, but Trump isn’t a Bible thumper and his image is one where you wouldn’t be surprised by it.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1. I don't know. Nobody here does.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
Why is he a spook?HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
its in the thread, former cia employeeip_law-hokie wrote:Why is he a spook?HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
From McMuffin's wiki page:ip_law-hokie wrote:Why is he a spook?HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.ip_law-hokie wrote:Why is he a spook?HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.HokieFanDC wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is he a spook?USN_Hokie wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.HokieFanDC wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.USN_Hokie wrote: Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah. What did you think it is?ip_law-hokie wrote:I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.HokieFanDC wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is he a spook?USN_Hokie wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.HokieFanDC wrote: Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.awesome guy wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:Yeah. What did you think it is?HokieFanDC wrote:I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.ip_law-hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.USN_Hokie wrote:
Why is he a spook?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote:I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.awesome guy wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:Yeah. What did you think it is?HokieFanDC wrote:I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.ip_law-hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote: He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.
LOL, you're in full Chewbacca defense. You should probably call me Trump Defense Brigade now.HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Stop trying to sugarcoat your BS. McMuffin was an undercover, overseas CIA operative (still is?). Aka "spook."HokieFanDC wrote: He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.
The first thing which came to IP's mind when I said "spook" was the derogatory term for a black person, apparently.awesome guy wrote:I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote: I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.
That's Methchester for ya.USN_Hokie wrote:The first thing which came to IP's mind when I said "spook" was the derogatory term for a black person, apparently.awesome guy wrote:I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote: I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.
Confirmation bias in spades.awesome guy wrote:That's Methchester for ya.USN_Hokie wrote:The first thing which came to IP's mind when I said "spook" was the derogatory term for a black person, apparently.awesome guy wrote:I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote: I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.
How is that?RiverguyVT wrote:Confirmation bias in spades.awesome guy wrote:That's Methchester for ya.USN_Hokie wrote:The first thing which came to IP's mind when I said "spook" was the derogatory term for a black person, apparently.awesome guy wrote:I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote: I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.