Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
https://uwsboard.com/
So, with respect to Clinton, we may get a chance to re-examine the case and find her a new home with bars?HokieHam wrote:'Removed' Next Day, More Heads To Roll: Report
Wow if true.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01- ... more-heads
I’m not holding my breath. But it would be nice to hold someone of power accountable.HokieFanDC wrote:So, with respect to Clinton, we may get a chance to re-examine the case and find her a new home with bars?HokieHam wrote:'Removed' Next Day, More Heads To Roll: Report
Wow if true.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01- ... more-heads
So you are ok with using gov. agencies to spy on potential and actual political candidates....that does not freak you out to your core that a sitting prez (Obummer) tried to affect the election in favor of Hillary with bogus info and illegal actions?????HokieFanDC wrote:So, with respect to Clinton, we may get a chance to re-examine the case and find her a new home with bars?HokieHam wrote:'Removed' Next Day, More Heads To Roll: Report
Wow if true.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01- ... more-heads
What in the wide, wide world of sports are you talking about? Your post isn't remotely related to mine...cwtcr hokie wrote:So you are ok with using gov. agencies to spy on potential and actual political candidates....that does not freak you out to your core that a sitting prez (Obummer) tried to affect the election in favor of Hillary with bogus info and illegal actions?????HokieFanDC wrote:So, with respect to Clinton, we may get a chance to re-examine the case and find her a new home with bars?HokieHam wrote:'Removed' Next Day, More Heads To Roll: Report
Wow if true.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01- ... more-heads
Yes, Obummer and his idiots need to be held accountable
re-examine a case that was never done in the first place? check out the memo, the crap is about to hit the fanHokieFanDC wrote:What in the wide, wide world of sports are you talking about? Your post isn't remotely related to mine...cwtcr hokie wrote:So you are ok with using gov. agencies to spy on potential and actual political candidates....that does not freak you out to your core that a sitting prez (Obummer) tried to affect the election in favor of Hillary with bogus info and illegal actions?????HokieFanDC wrote:So, with respect to Clinton, we may get a chance to re-examine the case and find her a new home with bars?HokieHam wrote:'Removed' Next Day, More Heads To Roll: Report
Wow if true.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01- ... more-heads
Yes, Obummer and his idiots need to be held accountable
I'm trying to figure out how my post about getting Hillary in jail makes you think I am OK with using gov agencies to spy on political candidates?cwtcr hokie wrote:re-examine a case that was never done in the first place? check out the memo, the crap is about to hit the fanHokieFanDC wrote:What in the wide, wide world of sports are you talking about? Your post isn't remotely related to mine...cwtcr hokie wrote:So you are ok with using gov. agencies to spy on potential and actual political candidates....that does not freak you out to your core that a sitting prez (Obummer) tried to affect the election in favor of Hillary with bogus info and illegal actions?????HokieFanDC wrote:So, with respect to Clinton, we may get a chance to re-examine the case and find her a new home with bars?HokieHam wrote:'Removed' Next Day, More Heads To Roll: Report
Wow if true.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01- ... more-heads
Yes, Obummer and his idiots need to be held accountable
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... 77af678997The inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, has been asking witnesses why FBI leadership seemed unwilling to move forward on the examination of emails found on the laptop of former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) until late October — about three weeks after first being alerted to the issue, according to these people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.
HokieHam wrote:Then there’s this......I can’t believe they’re reporting this.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... 77af678997The inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, has been asking witnesses why FBI leadership seemed unwilling to move forward on the examination of emails found on the laptop of former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) until late October — about three weeks after first being alerted to the issue, according to these people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.
They are on the defense with this matter. What would you expect them to say? Heads should roll, and likely will. They abrogated responsibilityHooFighter wrote:I guess he was "shocked to his core" about what a piece of shȋt it is.
I'd be surprised if the FBI praised a memo that probably has some criticisms of the FBI.HooFighter wrote:I guess he was "shocked to his core" about what a piece of shȋt it is.
Translation : FBI manipulated the FISA court for political gain and is in damage control.HooFighter wrote:I guess he was "shocked to his core" about what a piece of shȋt it is.
HooFighter wrote:I guess he was "shocked to his core" about what a piece of shȋt it is.
Ding ding ding!Translation : FBI manipulated the FISA court for political gain and is in damage control.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... ource.htmlTwo senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News – adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.”
The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division – followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Their latest spin is that it omits facts counter to the picture it paints. They're not done.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Ummm....too late. The FBI has already said there are no inaccuracies:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... ource.htmlTwo senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News – adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.”
The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division – followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Yup. Discredit and obfuscate.awesome guy wrote:Their latest spin is that it omits facts counter to the picture it paints. They're not done.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Ummm....too late. The FBI has already said there are no inaccuracies:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... ource.htmlTwo senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News – adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.”
The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division – followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray.
I could say awesome guy didn't have sex with any barnyard animals *last night* and there would be no factual inaccuracies.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Ummm....too late. The FBI has already said there are no inaccuracies:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... ource.htmlTwo senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News – adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.”
The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division – followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Look everybody, Hoof is trying to be smart! Better luck next time.HooFighter wrote:I could say awesome guy didn't have sex with any barnyard animals *last night* and there would be no factual inaccuracies.UpstateSCHokie wrote:Ummm....too late. The FBI has already said there are no inaccuracies:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... ource.htmlTwo senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News – adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.”
The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division – followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray.