Rick Scott announces plan to introduce bill
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:49 pm
in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
Virginia Tech fans discussing politics, religion, and football
https://uwsboard.com/
Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
Including abortions, but that is not a hashtag on twitter today.133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
Never will be. That is the sacred altar of the (D)emonic Party.CFB Apologist wrote:Including abortions, but that is not a hashtag on twitter today.133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
Depends on what your criteria is. Certainly there is no scientific basis for it. AFAIK, 18 was the age that was set for military enrollment, and then became the basis for voting, and then a bunch of other things. Maybe it was chosen b/c that's when most people graduated, and entered the workforce, or college, or whatever the next step is.133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
All the professionals for years have disagreed with you on that. It's fact.awesome guy wrote:133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
totally disagree. They're formed enough to be adults.
Nope133743Hokie wrote:All the professionals for years have disagreed with you on that. It's fact.awesome guy wrote:133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
totally disagree. They're formed enough to be adults.
Has nothing to do with the age of the shooter.HokieFanDC wrote:Depends on what your criteria is. Certainly there is no scientific basis for it. AFAIK, 18 was the age that was set for military enrollment, and then became the basis for voting, and then a bunch of other things. Maybe it was chosen b/c that's when most people graduated, and entered the workforce, or college, or whatever the next step is.133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
But, I still think it's a reasonable age, there are plenty of reasonable 18 year olds, it's probably more related to parenting, than age.
As for 21, how many of the mass shootings were people over 21? This idea is a prime example of tunnel vision on the latest crime.
As with everything there are always exceptions and special cases. But most professionals say kids are not developed mentally at 18.cwtcr hokie wrote:133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
For some maybe but sorry at 18 you are very capable of being an adult....do humans make errors at every age... you betcha
That's BS. Saying an 18 year old isn't an adult is a whacko position.133743Hokie wrote:Has nothing to do with the age of the shooter.HokieFanDC wrote:Depends on what your criteria is. Certainly there is no scientific basis for it. AFAIK, 18 was the age that was set for military enrollment, and then became the basis for voting, and then a bunch of other things. Maybe it was chosen b/c that's when most people graduated, and entered the workforce, or college, or whatever the next step is.133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
But, I still think it's a reasonable age, there are plenty of reasonable 18 year olds, it's probably more related to parenting, than age.
As for 21, how many of the mass shootings were people over 21? This idea is a prime example of tunnel vision on the latest crime.
If people want to continue to put age restrictions on things for "adults" then we need to find a common, uniform age and shift everything to that age. IMO, and of most professionals, 18 is too young and 21 is better.
The military needed bodies and set 18 as their age. It was the age when people finished school and entered the work force.
Just because you disagree doesn't make it wrong. I know that's your MO on here, to dig in your heels regardless of the data. But at some point you'll have to admit someone besides you is right about something.awesome guy wrote:Nope133743Hokie wrote:All the professionals for years have disagreed with you on that. It's fact.awesome guy wrote:133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
totally disagree. They're formed enough to be adults.
The government has determined 18 is an adult, for some tings. To believe that an 18 year old is fully developed mentally and emotionally is whacko.awesome guy wrote:That's BS. Saying an 18 year old isn't an adult is a whacko position.133743Hokie wrote:Has nothing to do with the age of the shooter.HokieFanDC wrote:Depends on what your criteria is. Certainly there is no scientific basis for it. AFAIK, 18 was the age that was set for military enrollment, and then became the basis for voting, and then a bunch of other things. Maybe it was chosen b/c that's when most people graduated, and entered the workforce, or college, or whatever the next step is.133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote:Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all dayElbertoHokie wrote:in Florida to require anyone purchasing a firearm to be 21 or older with the exception of military personnel or police.
But, I still think it's a reasonable age, there are plenty of reasonable 18 year olds, it's probably more related to parenting, than age.
As for 21, how many of the mass shootings were people over 21? This idea is a prime example of tunnel vision on the latest crime.
If people want to continue to put age restrictions on things for "adults" then we need to find a common, uniform age and shift everything to that age. IMO, and of most professionals, 18 is too young and 21 is better.
The military needed bodies and set 18 as their age. It was the age when people finished school and entered the work force.
You're FOS. Anyone not looking to ban guns considers 18 the age of maturity.133743Hokie wrote:Just because you disagree doesn't make it wrong. I know that's your MO on here, to dig in your heels regardless of the data. But at some point you'll have to admit someone besides you is right about something.awesome guy wrote:Nope133743Hokie wrote:All the professionals for years have disagreed with you on that. It's fact.awesome guy wrote:133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote: Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all day
totally disagree. They're formed enough to be adults.
I said "developed enough". Your position is whacko land stuff, he'll, being literal, no one is fully developed till death as we're always developing.133743Hokie wrote:The government has determined 18 is an adult, for some tings. To believe that an 18 year old is fully developed mentally and emotionally is whacko.awesome guy wrote:That's BS. Saying an 18 year old isn't an adult is a whacko position.133743Hokie wrote:Has nothing to do with the age of the shooter.HokieFanDC wrote:Depends on what your criteria is. Certainly there is no scientific basis for it. AFAIK, 18 was the age that was set for military enrollment, and then became the basis for voting, and then a bunch of other things. Maybe it was chosen b/c that's when most people graduated, and entered the workforce, or college, or whatever the next step is.133743Hokie wrote:The problem is that 18 shouldn't be the age of majority. The are too young, their brains are still forming and their hormones are raging. 21 should be the age of majority for everything that is "adult" restricted.cwtcr hokie wrote: Sorry, I don't get the age restrictions, I realize the little snowflakes can't handle life anymore but when you are 18 you are of legal age to be an adult....so tell the little effers to grow the hell up, curious tho how many have lots of dollars to go buy guns and ammo...hard to make money sleeping on your moms couch all day
But, I still think it's a reasonable age, there are plenty of reasonable 18 year olds, it's probably more related to parenting, than age.
As for 21, how many of the mass shootings were people over 21? This idea is a prime example of tunnel vision on the latest crime.
If people want to continue to put age restrictions on things for "adults" then we need to find a common, uniform age and shift everything to that age. IMO, and of most professionals, 18 is too young and 21 is better.
The military needed bodies and set 18 as their age. It was the age when people finished school and entered the work force.
You're coming unglued over this.awesome guy wrote:I said "developed enough". Your position is whacko land stuff, he'll, being literal, no one is fully developed till death as we're always developing.133743Hokie wrote:The government has determined 18 is an adult, for some tings. To believe that an 18 year old is fully developed mentally and emotionally is whacko.awesome guy wrote:That's BS. Saying an 18 year old isn't an adult is a whacko position.133743Hokie wrote:Has nothing to do with the age of the shooter.HokieFanDC wrote:
Depends on what your criteria is. Certainly there is no scientific basis for it. AFAIK, 18 was the age that was set for military enrollment, and then became the basis for voting, and then a bunch of other things. Maybe it was chosen b/c that's when most people graduated, and entered the workforce, or college, or whatever the next step is.
But, I still think it's a reasonable age, there are plenty of reasonable 18 year olds, it's probably more related to parenting, than age.
As for 21, how many of the mass shootings were people over 21? This idea is a prime example of tunnel vision on the latest crime.
If people want to continue to put age restrictions on things for "adults" then we need to find a common, uniform age and shift everything to that age. IMO, and of most professionals, 18 is too young and 21 is better.
The military needed bodies and set 18 as their age. It was the age when people finished school and entered the work force.
I'm a couple steps ahead of you. I'm not unglued, I'm laughing at your retarded claims. IQ and mental capabilities diminish way late in life. Your arguing against science and reason, it's hilarious.133743Hokie wrote:You're coming unglued over this.awesome guy wrote:I said "developed enough". Your position is whacko land stuff, he'll, being literal, no one is fully developed till death as we're always developing.133743Hokie wrote:The government has determined 18 is an adult, for some tings. To believe that an 18 year old is fully developed mentally and emotionally is whacko.awesome guy wrote:That's BS. Saying an 18 year old isn't an adult is a whacko position.133743Hokie wrote:Has nothing to do with the age of the shooter.HokieFanDC wrote:
Depends on what your criteria is. Certainly there is no scientific basis for it. AFAIK, 18 was the age that was set for military enrollment, and then became the basis for voting, and then a bunch of other things. Maybe it was chosen b/c that's when most people graduated, and entered the workforce, or college, or whatever the next step is.
But, I still think it's a reasonable age, there are plenty of reasonable 18 year olds, it's probably more related to parenting, than age.
As for 21, how many of the mass shootings were people over 21? This idea is a prime example of tunnel vision on the latest crime.
If people want to continue to put age restrictions on things for "adults" then we need to find a common, uniform age and shift everything to that age. IMO, and of most professionals, 18 is too young and 21 is better.
The military needed bodies and set 18 as their age. It was the age when people finished school and entered the work force.
Oh, and your brain peaks and then starts declining over time. In fact, I expect yours is in deep dive these days based on your pistingvrecently.
(Nodding)133743Hokie wrote: You're coming unglued over this.
Oh, and your brain peaks and then starts declining over time. In fact, I expect yours is in deep dive these days based on your pistingvrecently.
Nolan's agreement seals his argument as wrong. Better get back to "the office" for dinner rush.nolanvt wrote:(Nodding)133743Hokie wrote: You're coming unglued over this.
Oh, and your brain peaks and then starts declining over time. In fact, I expect yours is in deep dive these days based on your pistingvrecently.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The prefrontal cortex is not fully developed at 18, doesn't fully develop until 25. Most studies agree that people are not fully developed by 18. But, of course, there is no way to say precisely when a person is "mature".awesome guy wrote:I'm a couple steps ahead of you. I'm not unglued, I'm laughing at your retarded claims. IQ and mental capabilities diminish way late in life. Your arguing against science and reason, it's hilarious.133743Hokie wrote:You're coming unglued over this.awesome guy wrote:I said "developed enough". Your position is whacko land stuff, he'll, being literal, no one is fully developed till death as we're always developing.133743Hokie wrote:The government has determined 18 is an adult, for some tings. To believe that an 18 year old is fully developed mentally and emotionally is whacko.awesome guy wrote:That's BS. Saying an 18 year old isn't an adult is a whacko position.133743Hokie wrote: Has nothing to do with the age of the shooter.
If people want to continue to put age restrictions on things for "adults" then we need to find a common, uniform age and shift everything to that age. IMO, and of most professionals, 18 is too young and 21 is better.
The military needed bodies and set 18 as their age. It was the age when people finished school and entered the work force.
Oh, and your brain peaks and then starts declining over time. In fact, I expect yours is in deep dive these days based on your pistingvrecently.