Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Trump is going to bait people into thinking
that attorney-client privilege is under attack among the low infos. This is a sneakily good narrative he’s pulling off.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30316
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Hot takenolanvt wrote:that attorney-client privilege is under attack among the low infos. This is a sneakily good narrative he’s pulling off.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Ooooooooooooooknolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Dershowitz was accepted to Marshall, but Yale was closer to home.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30316
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Hot take
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.nolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
?USN_Hokie wrote:Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.nolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Oh no. It's retarded.nolanvt wrote:?USN_Hokie wrote:Maybe it would just be easier if you provided us a link to the YouTube video you watched.nolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right?nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Takes get hotternolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]USN_Hokie wrote:Dershowitz was accepted to Marshall, but Yale was closer to home. [emoji38]cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?awesome guy wrote:Takes get hotternolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.nolanvt wrote:Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?awesome guy wrote:Takes get hotternolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.awesome guy wrote:How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.nolanvt wrote:Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?awesome guy wrote:Takes get hotternolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]nolanvt wrote: Precisely
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.nolanvt wrote:I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.awesome guy wrote:How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.nolanvt wrote:Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?awesome guy wrote:Takes get hotternolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote: so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Precisely
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber[/quote]
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Takes get hotter
[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][/quote]
Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.[/quote]
I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
what crime?????????? So far we heard thru leaks that is involves "hush" money.....FYI, NDA's are done by many people daily and it is not illegal, it is a contract. IF Trump boinked anyone that is also not illegal so what exact crime was there?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber[/quote]
Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Takes get hotter
[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][/quote]
Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]How are you even making the assessment that a crime took place? You're an idiot in general and here specifically have no idea what you're saying. You're already calling something a crime without bothering to comprehend that it's UnAmerican to raid an office to discover a crime. It works the other way, compelling evidence arrives first and then action takes place. And even then, they should have subpoenaed documents in question instead of raiding the office. Smart people can understand this.[/quote]
I didn’t say a crime definitively took place. The FBI thinks a crime may have taken place, so that’s why they got a warrant to conduct the raid. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window at that point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
what crime?????????? So far we heard thru leaks that is involves "hush" money.....FYI, NDA's are done by many people daily and it is not illegal, it is a contract. IF Trump boinked anyone that is also not illegal so what exact crime was there?
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Of course that is the exception, and most understand that. They gray area is vacuuming up all info and having a Chinese Wall within the FBI review everything and ascertain what is relevant. THAT is a reach, particularly in the current environment and public thinking about the politicization of the DOJ and FBI. Should have only been able to take those documents specific to a proven case where attorney-client privilege doesn't exist.nolanvt wrote:Yes or no question: do you believe Attorney-Client privilege exists when the attorney either assists their client in breaking the law or breaks the law themselves while conducting activities on the client’s behalf?awesome guy wrote:Takes get hotternolanvt wrote:Pretty simple. Attorney-Client privilege goes out the window if the attorney is engaging in a criminal act as well.cwtcr hokie wrote:so renowned lawyers are wrong? And you are right? [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]nolanvt wrote:PreciselyUSN_Hokie wrote:Low info folks like Alan Dershowitz and Mark Geragos?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stop drinking uncle festers kool aid, you are just getting dumber
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?awesome guy wrote:
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
Are you really this stupid? A raid is for the case where you know destruction is imminent. Like Hillary unleashing bit bleach on the server. It's not for you not liking Trump.nolanvt wrote:And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?awesome guy wrote:
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
If the attorney broke the law or assisted in breaking the law, the privilege is revoked. I don’t work for the FBI, so I can’t tell you exactly what they’re investigating Cohen for.cwtcr hokie wrote:
what crime?????????? So far we heard thru leaks that is involves "hush" money.....FYI, NDA's are done by many people daily and it is not illegal, it is a contract. IF Trump boinked anyone that is also not illegal so what exact crime was there?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
You are completely missing the point, law enforcement cannot just go grab every document and hope there is a crime in there somewhere. Esp. with a lawyer as the evidence is tainted due to the way it was obtained.nolanvt wrote:And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?awesome guy wrote:
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Trump is going to bait people into thinking
The FBI must have believed that was imminent then.awesome guy wrote:Are you really this stupid? A raid is for the case where you know destruction is imminent. Like Hillary unleashing bit bleach on the server. It's not for you not liking Trump.nolanvt wrote:And you believe destroying documents is out of the question?awesome guy wrote:
Nope, you're stupid AF. A raid is only for extreme cases, like they think the docs will be destroyed immediately. This is another witch hunt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead