ip_law-hokie wrote:Please keep the board up to date on its ultimate disposition.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Another chime-in for "process be damned".
(patting you on the head) Good commie. Good commie. Goooood boy...(/patting)
That’s incorrect. I want you to report on all the details of this case. Maybe then you will realize the bullshit march your pathological lying leader has you on.
Are you suggesting the federal courts are in on the fix? You guys can’t be taken seriously.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But the pathological lying leader isn't one of the affiants.
So, your position is that hundreds of people are committing perjury in concert.
Interesting angle. Quite the ..uh.....conspiracy.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Were those the only complaints in the affidavits, or are there other complaints the WaPo activist selectively decided not to mention?
It matters.
if you read the article (i did), it details all the complaints. while these were the most ridiculous, there were no substantive complaints.
So, WaPo sanitizes for their viewpoint, you read it and that's that.
How about you read the lawsuit and its summary of the hundreds of affidavits? The complaints are indeed substantive. Of course, the leftists would rather mock those complaints to help "their guy" franchise integrity be damned.
i just read it. i see nothing substantive. i see unsubstantiated complaints about how people were mean to them while they observed. which means they _were_ observing.
i find it hilarious that trumpers are doing all they can to overturn the will of the people and then want to lecture the rest of us about integrity.
you should stick to conspiracy theories about incest and pedophilia.
If people being "mean" was all you gathered from the filed suit, you either (or combination of):
a- can't read
b- don't understand what the word "substantive" means
c- believe there is a mass conspiracy of affiants
d- don't understand vote integrity
or
e- don't care because "yeah team!" and 'damn the integrity of the process meant to protect us'
as for conspiracies about incest and pedophilia...please answer a question. Do you believe the Hunter Biden hard drive to be a Russian plant?
and where do you get the idea that I am
1- a "trumper"
or
2- "want to overthrow the will of the people"?
....utter nonsense.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Were those the only complaints in the affidavits, or are there other complaints the WaPo activist selectively decided not to mention?
It matters.
if you read the article (i did), it details all the complaints. while these were the most ridiculous, there were no substantive complaints.
So, WaPo sanitizes for their viewpoint, you read it and that's that.
How about you read the lawsuit and its summary of the hundreds of affidavits? The complaints are indeed substantive. Of course, the leftists would rather mock those complaints to help "their guy" franchise integrity be damned.
i just read it. i see nothing substantive. i see unsubstantiated complaints about how people were mean to them while they observed. which means they _were_ observing.
i find it hilarious that trumpers are doing all they can to overturn the will of the people and then want to lecture the rest of us about integrity.
you should stick to conspiracy theories about incest and pedophilia.
If people being "mean" was all you gathered from the filed suit, you either (or combination of):
a- can't read
b- don't understand what the word "substantive" means
c- believe there is a mass conspiracy of affiants
d- don't understand vote integrity
or
e- don't care because "yeah team!" and 'damn the integrity of the process meant to protect us'
as for conspiracies about incest and pedophilia...please answer a question. Do you believe the Hunter Biden hard drive to be a Russian plant?
and where do you get the idea that I am
1- a "trumper"
or
2- "want to overthrow the will of the people"?
....utter nonsense.
judge throws out the lawsuit because complaints were not substantive.
RiverguyVT wrote:
Were those the only complaints in the affidavits, or are there other complaints the WaPo activist selectively decided not to mention?
It matters.
if you read the article (i did), it details all the complaints. while these were the most ridiculous, there were no substantive complaints.
So, WaPo sanitizes for their viewpoint, you read it and that's that.
How about you read the lawsuit and its summary of the hundreds of affidavits? The complaints are indeed substantive. Of course, the leftists would rather mock those complaints to help "their guy" franchise integrity be damned.
i just read it. i see nothing substantive. i see unsubstantiated complaints about how people were mean to them while they observed. which means they _were_ observing.
i find it hilarious that trumpers are doing all they can to overturn the will of the people and then want to lecture the rest of us about integrity.
you should stick to conspiracy theories about incest and pedophilia.
If people being "mean" was all you gathered from the filed suit, you either (or combination of):
a- can't read
b- don't understand what the word "substantive" means
c- believe there is a mass conspiracy of affiants
d- don't understand vote integrity
or
e- don't care because "yeah team!" and 'damn the integrity of the process meant to protect us'
as for conspiracies about incest and pedophilia...please answer a question. Do you believe the Hunter Biden hard drive to be a Russian plant?
and where do you get the idea that I am
1- a "trumper"
or
2- "want to overthrow the will of the people"?
....utter nonsense.
judge throws out the lawsuit because complaints were not substantive.
Plaintiffs' interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible
Taxpayers take an L.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
RiverguyVT wrote:Don't mistake severe dislike of the left as being the same thing as cultish love for Trump. It is a terrible simplification that too many make.
Has nothing to do with dislike of the left.
"The adoration of many Trump supporters, also cultish."
Cult - misplaced or excessive admiration for a particular person or thing.
Like Odumfvck
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
Recordings of Federal Agents Trying to Intimidate USPS Whistleblower Into Recanting Election Fraud Claim
The girls are too busy character assassinating the whistleblower.
They guzzle the propoganda from the WaPoo and other MoT sources.
Looks like all the unusuals decided to STFU and stop embarrassing themselves denigrating a whistleblower who was suspended without pay for creating a gofundme, and defending WaPo fake news.
“This thread is aging well” lol
Lawsuit settlement says what?
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.
Recordings of Federal Agents Trying to Intimidate USPS Whistleblower Into Recanting Election Fraud Claim
The girls are too busy character assassinating the whistleblower.
They guzzle the propoganda from the WaPoo and other MoT sources.
Looks like all the unusuals decided to STFU and stop embarrassing themselves denigrating a whistleblower who was suspended without pay for creating a gofundme, and defending WaPo fake news.
“This thread is aging well” lol
Lawsuit settlement says what?
LOL
PA was less about postal stuff than ridiculous 're-setting' law.
Carry on.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
The girls are too busy character assassinating the whistleblower.
They guzzle the propoganda from the WaPoo and other MoT sources.
Looks like all the unusuals decided to STFU and stop embarrassing themselves denigrating a whistleblower who was suspended without pay for creating a gofundme, and defending WaPo fake news.
“This thread is aging well” lol
Lawsuit settlement says what?
LOL
PA was less about postal stuff than ridiculous 're-setting' law.
Carry on.
No it’s about you all amplifying nonsense from James O’Keefe, Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge, and other various fictional propaganda.
Carry on yourself.
Donald Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man, a poor man's idea of a rich man, and a weak man's idea of a strong man.
HooFighter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:33 am
No it’s about you all amplifying nonsense from James O’Keefe, Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge, and other various fictional propaganda.
Carry on yourself.
Let's back up.
Original OKeefe story - ran based off a sworn affidavit by a postal employee.
Your "ah hah!" moment, years later - O"Keefe retracts his story, himself. Okay.
I'm trying to remember the last time a leftist mouthpiece came back several years later with a retraction, but that begs the question on my part.
The case you try to make on so many things is paper-thin. Rice paper thin.
This molehill of victory is yours. Sort of. Rejoice in it.
Meanwhile, you have no answer on laws changed in PA
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
USN_Hokie wrote:
The girls are too busy character assassinating the whistleblower.
They guzzle the propoganda from the WaPoo and other MoT sources.
Looks like all the unusuals decided to STFU and stop embarrassing themselves denigrating a whistleblower who was suspended without pay for creating a gofundme, and defending WaPo fake news.
“This thread is aging well” lol
Lawsuit settlement says what?
LOL
PA was less about postal stuff than ridiculous 're-setting' law.
Carry on.
No it’s about you all amplifying nonsense from James O’Keefe, Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge, and other various fictional propaganda.
Carry on yourself.
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
