Sussman, Georgia Tech and the Clinton’s. Of course!

[HokieFanDC]

LOL @Turley. He's become such a publicity ho, he'll say anything. The idea that someone's donation history.should disqualify them, is ludicrously stupid.

Not at all.

Wow.

Why should it be a reason for disqualification???

And why do you think the prosecution didn't use either their peremptory challenges, or asked to have them dismissed for cause??? Maybe because the history of legal precedent disagrees with you and Turley.

To be so invested in the well being and promotion of a defendant's interests that one is giving money to promote and advance those interests and that defendant?

Yeah. No bias there.

A juror said:
"“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted. There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

There were jurors that donated money to Sussman...the defendant??? Who knew!???!!!
The verdict was unanimous. Durham must be the absolute worst at voir dire.

Also fairly certain that the majority of ppl in the US would agree with that juror about "bigger things", including 90% of UWS.

IOW, it's a very discomforting situation for lefties, so there are more iMpOrTaNt things to fOcUs on...Like fixing the problems leftist DF's voted for in electing Biden.

The only people heavily invested in the trial were the usual Charlie Browns that always fall for the false hope aimed at them.

[HokieJoe]

Not at all.

Wow.

Why should it be a reason for disqualification???

And why do you think the prosecution didn't use either their peremptory challenges, or asked to have them dismissed for cause??? Maybe because the history of legal precedent disagrees with you and Turley.

To be so invested in the well being and promotion of a defendant's interests that one is giving money to promote and advance those interests and that defendant?

Yeah. No bias there.

A juror said:
"“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted. There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

There were jurors that donated money to Sussman...the defendant??? Who knew!???!!!
The verdict was unanimous. Durham must be the absolute worst at voir dire.

Also fairly certain that the majority of ppl in the US would agree with that juror about "bigger things", including 90% of UWS.

IOW, it's a very discomforting situation for lefties, so there are more iMpOrTaNt things to fOcUs on...Like fixing the problems leftist DF's voted for in electing Biden.

The only people heavily invested in the trial were the usual Charlie Browns that always fall for the false hope aimed at them.

Uh huh.

A POTUS candidate (Hillary Clinton) sold a verified lie to the FBI for political retribution. The democrats doubled down on the bullish!t story to appoint a special counsel ffs over the same allegation.

Keep sawing that lefty log, HFDC.

[HokieFanDC]

Why should it be a reason for disqualification???

And why do you think the prosecution didn't use either their peremptory challenges, or asked to have them dismissed for cause??? Maybe because the history of legal precedent disagrees with you and Turley.

To be so invested in the well being and promotion of a defendant's interests that one is giving money to promote and advance those interests and that defendant?

Yeah. No bias there.

A juror said:
"“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted. There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

There were jurors that donated money to Sussman...the defendant??? Who knew!???!!!
The verdict was unanimous. Durham must be the absolute worst at voir dire.

Also fairly certain that the majority of ppl in the US would agree with that juror about "bigger things", including 90% of UWS.

IOW, it's a very discomforting situation for lefties, so there are more iMpOrTaNt things to fOcUs on...Like fixing the problems leftist DF's voted for in electing Biden.

The only people heavily invested in the trial were the usual Charlie Browns that always fall for the false hope aimed at them.

Uh huh.

A POTUS candidate (Hillary Clinton) sold a verified lie to the FBI for political retribution. The democrats doubled down on the bullish!t story to appoint a special counsel ffs over the same allegation.

Keep sawing that lefty log, HFDC.

And.....that has what to do with Sussman charge of lying to the FBI? As usual, you dolts act like Hillary was on trial and that it was going to bring out some never before known corruption or action. I'm not sawing any log, Joe. Just watching you guys fall for the same act, once again. Fool you once, that's a mistake. Fool you 100 times......

[HokieJoe]

To be so invested in the well being and promotion of a defendant's interests that one is giving money to promote and advance those interests and that defendant?

Yeah. No bias there.

A juror said:
"“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted. There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

There were jurors that donated money to Sussman...the defendant??? Who knew!???!!!
The verdict was unanimous. Durham must be the absolute worst at voir dire.

Also fairly certain that the majority of ppl in the US would agree with that juror about "bigger things", including 90% of UWS.

IOW, it's a very discomforting situation for lefties, so there are more iMpOrTaNt things to fOcUs on...Like fixing the problems leftist DF's voted for in electing Biden.

The only people heavily invested in the trial were the usual Charlie Browns that always fall for the false hope aimed at them.

Uh huh.

A POTUS candidate (Hillary Clinton) sold a verified lie to the FBI for political retribution. The democrats doubled down on the bullish!t story to appoint a special counsel ffs over the same allegation.

Keep sawing that lefty log, HFDC.

And.....that has what to do with Sussman charge of lying to the FBI? As usual, you dolts act like Hillary was on trial and that it was going to bring out some never before known corruption or action. I'm not sawing any log, Joe. Just watching you guys fall for the same act, once again. Fool you once, that's a mistake. Fool you 100 times......

Sussman didn't lie, he actually believed that f'ing Alfa Bank bullish!t. All the characters in play were either donors, legal representatives or campaign officials from the dnc. No chance it was a political hit job!

[HokieFanDC]

There were jurors that donated money to Sussman...the defendant??? Who knew!???!!!
The verdict was unanimous. Durham must be the absolute worst at voir dire.

Also fairly certain that the majority of ppl in the US would agree with that juror about "bigger things", including 90% of UWS.

IOW, it's a very discomforting situation for lefties, so there are more iMpOrTaNt things to fOcUs on...Like fixing the problems leftist DF's voted for in electing Biden.

The only people heavily invested in the trial were the usual Charlie Browns that always fall for the false hope aimed at them.

Uh huh.

A POTUS candidate (Hillary Clinton) sold a verified lie to the FBI for political retribution. The democrats doubled down on the bullish!t story to appoint a special counsel ffs over the same allegation.

Keep sawing that lefty log, HFDC.

And.....that has what to do with Sussman charge of lying to the FBI? As usual, you dolts act like Hillary was on trial and that it was going to bring out some never before known corruption or action. I'm not sawing any log, Joe. Just watching you guys fall for the same act, once again. Fool you once, that's a mistake. Fool you 100 times......

Sussman didn't lie, he actually believed that f'ing Alfa Bank bullish!t. All the characters in play were either donors, legal representatives or campaign officials from the dnc. No chance it was a political hit job!

OK, what does that have to do with Sussman's trial about lying to the FBI? You keep on talking about things that have nothing to do with whether the charges against him were valid.

[HokieJoe]

IOW, it's a very discomforting situation for lefties, so there are more iMpOrTaNt things to fOcUs on...Like fixing the problems leftist DF's voted for in electing Biden.

The only people heavily invested in the trial were the usual Charlie Browns that always fall for the false hope aimed at them.

Uh huh.

A POTUS candidate (Hillary Clinton) sold a verified lie to the FBI for political retribution. The democrats doubled down on the bullish!t story to appoint a special counsel ffs over the same allegation.

Keep sawing that lefty log, HFDC.

And.....that has what to do with Sussman charge of lying to the FBI? As usual, you dolts act like Hillary was on trial and that it was going to bring out some never before known corruption or action. I'm not sawing any log, Joe. Just watching you guys fall for the same act, once again. Fool you once, that's a mistake. Fool you 100 times......

Sussman didn't lie, he actually believed that f'ing Alfa Bank bullish!t. All the characters in play were either donors, legal representatives or campaign officials from the dnc. No chance it was a political hit job!

OK, what does that have to do with Sussman's trial about lying to the FBI? You keep on talking about things that have nothing to do with whether the charges against him were valid.

The charges against him ARE valid. He lied, but the dirty F's at the FBI didn't care that he was lying. Their bogus FISA applications prove that much.

Hillary Clinton framed her political with opponent with bullish!t charges and the FBI helped her accomplish her goal.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

[HooFighter]

The charges against him ARE valid. He lied, but the dirty F's at the FBI didn't care that he was lying. Their bogus FISA applications prove that much.

Hillary Clinton framed her political with opponent with bullish!t charges and the FBI helped her accomplish her goal.

Last time I checked Hillary Clinton lost the election, seems like she didn't really accomplish her goal. I think If the FBI helped accomplish anyone's goals it was by doing the "but her emails" thing.

Anyway, speaking of lying,..

[HokieFanDC]

The only people heavily invested in the trial were the usual Charlie Browns that always fall for the false hope aimed at them.

Uh huh.

A POTUS candidate (Hillary Clinton) sold a verified lie to the FBI for political retribution. The democrats doubled down on the bullish!t story to appoint a special counsel ffs over the same allegation.

Keep sawing that lefty log, HFDC.

And.....that has what to do with Sussman charge of lying to the FBI? As usual, you dolts act like Hillary was on trial and that it was going to bring out some never before known corruption or action. I'm not sawing any log, Joe. Just watching you guys fall for the same act, once again. Fool you once, that's a mistake. Fool you 100 times......

Sussman didn't lie, he actually believed that f'ing Alfa Bank bullish!t. All the characters in play were either donors, legal representatives or campaign officials from the dnc. No chance it was a political hit job!

OK, what does that have to do with Sussman's trial about lying to the FBI? You keep on talking about things that have nothing to do with whether the charges against him were valid.

The charges against him ARE valid. He lied, but the dirty F's at the FBI didn't care that he was lying. Their bogus FISA applications prove that much.

Hillary Clinton framed her political with opponent with bullish!t charges and the FBI helped her accomplish her goal.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

12 out 12 jurors disagree with you.

[UpstateSCHokie]

New info the further proves Trump was spied on

[HokieHam]

New info the further proves Trump was spied on

Yup. Posted it in another thread……….someone, preferably a group of these AHoles, needs to go to jail for this utter bullshiRt

[HokieJoe]

New info the further proves Trump was spied on

Of course he was spied on. And sh!tlibs have the stones to still whine about Watergate.

[UpstateSCHokie]

Of course he was spied on. And sh!tlibs have the stones to still whine about Watergate.

And yet crickets from the AWOLS here.

[HokieJoe]

Of course he was spied on. And sh!tlibs have the stones to still whine about Watergate.

And yet crickets from the AWOLS here.

When they can't get their way, they run away.

[HokieHam]

New info the further proves Trump was spied on

Of course he was spied on. And sh!tlibs have the stones to still whine about Watergate.

This Maoist fuk is probably trying to figure out a way to repeat what happened in 2016……