http://hawaiiishot.com/at-the-very-leas ... -over.html
This article is pretty scary. Is there a radiologist in the house to explain if it's warranted concern or hysteria?
I bet there is some concern, but not enough to shutdown the largest fishery on the planet. For just a second, let's ignore the ramifications for America. What about the thousands of pacific islands? They're completely dependent on seafood to survive. Are they going to stop eating seafood and starving from this? I'm sure there will be an increase in cancer and radiation related illnesses. But enough to shut everything down? What I'm getting at is some are going to have to eat seafood. Their islands don't support enough cattle or hawgs to feed the community. And if it's as bad as this article describes, radiation is going to be pooped all over them from birds feeding on seafood. From there, it's in the soil and plants. So how bad is it? Offspring incompatible with life? 3 eyed kids bad? Cancer at 70 instead of 80? What's the real risk? Shutting it all down isn't going to be an option.
Back to here in the US, yes we could shut it down. But then again, CA Argentina, Chile, etc risk coastal contamination and that just so happens to be where we grow a lot of our food.
Pacific contaminated with radiation?
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Pacific contaminated with radiation?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15769
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Meh it reads like someone has watched to many 50's...
nuclear monster movies (Godzilla).
In other words hokum.
In other words hokum.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: Meh it reads like someone has watched to many 50's...
Like 1950s Godzilla or quasi-scientific Godzilla?Major Kong wrote:nuclear monster movies (Godzilla).
In other words hokum.
Is there any risk at all? Seems like she's leaking pretty good. Or is it so little it's diluted in the ocean?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 2:06 am
- Alma Mater: Penn State
Re: Pacific contaminated with radiation?
http://enenews.com/
awesome guy wrote:http://hawaiiishot.com/at-the-very-leas ... -over.html
This article is pretty scary. Is there a radiologist in the house to explain if it's warranted concern or hysteria?
I bet there is some concern, but not enough to shutdown the largest fishery on the planet. For just a second, let's ignore the ramifications for America. What about the thousands of pacific islands? They're completely dependent on seafood to survive. Are they going to stop eating seafood and starving from this? I'm sure there will be an increase in cancer and radiation related illnesses. But enough to shut everything down? What I'm getting at is some are going to have to eat seafood. Their islands don't support enough cattle or hawgs to feed the community. And if it's as bad as this article describes, radiation is going to be pooped all over them from birds feeding on seafood. From there, it's in the soil and plants. So how bad is it? Offspring incompatible with life? 3 eyed kids bad? Cancer at 70 instead of 80? What's the real risk? Shutting it all down isn't going to be an option.
Back to here in the US, yes we could shut it down. But then again, CA Argentina, Chile, etc risk coastal contamination and that just so happens to be where we grow a lot of our food.
- Major Kong
- Posts: 15769
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:35 pm
- Alma Mater: Ferrum VT ASU
- Party: Independent
- Location: Somewhere between Marion and Seven Mile Ford
Re: Meh it reads like someone has watched to many 50's...
50's Godzilla or the Giant Behemoth.awesome guy wrote:Like 1950s Godzilla or quasi-scientific Godzilla?
Is there any risk at all? Seems like she's leaking pretty good. Or is it so little it's diluted in the ocean?
Hellfar the map shown isn't even a "radiation" map but a map plotting the tsunami from 2011. The POS author is lying about the actual genesis of the map and its meaning.
Sham article written by a sham blogger...about what I expect from sham enviromeddlers.
I only post using 100% recycled electrons.
- Bay_area_Hokie
- Posts: 6033
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:53 am
- Alma Mater: VT
- Party: Surprise Party
Re: Pacific contaminated with radiation?
Good video for you on risks of mercury in canned tunaawesome guy wrote:http://hawaiiishot.com/at-the-very-leas ... -over.html
This article is pretty scary. Is there a radiologist in the house to explain if it's warranted concern or hysteria?
I bet there is some concern, but not enough to shutdown the largest fishery on the planet. For just a second, let's ignore the ramifications for America. What about the thousands of pacific islands? They're completely dependent on seafood to survive. Are they going to stop eating seafood and starving from this? I'm sure there will be an increase in cancer and radiation related illnesses. But enough to shut everything down? What I'm getting at is some are going to have to eat seafood. Their islands don't support enough cattle or hawgs to feed the community. And if it's as bad as this article describes, radiation is going to be pooped all over them from birds feeding on seafood. From there, it's in the soil and plants. So how bad is it? Offspring incompatible with life? 3 eyed kids bad? Cancer at 70 instead of 80? What's the real risk? Shutting it all down isn't going to be an option.
Back to here in the US, yes we could shut it down. But then again, CA Argentina, Chile, etc risk coastal contamination and that just so happens to be where we grow a lot of our food.
http://nutritionfacts.org/video/the-eff ... ture-wages
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
“With God there are only individuals” - Philosopher Nicolas Gomez Davila