This article is so good the leftists are DDoS'ing their website. I've been trying to link it all day to no avail. Found an archived version.
https://archive.is/z6xxP
The Google Memo: 4 Scientists Respond
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26682
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: The Google Memo: 4 Scientists Respond
But, conservatives are fascists! LOL......good stuff. Thanks for posting.USN_Hokie wrote:This article is so good the leftists are DDoS'ing their website. I've been trying to link it all day to no avail. Found an archived version.
https://archive.is/z6xxP
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
Re: The Google Memo: 4 Scientists Respond
This is a great point that really deserves highlighting. You see this same trend in almost every gender equality program:
He then goes on to explain precisely why this is the case. It's a sharp argument.Here, I just want to take a step back from the memo controversy, to highlight a paradox at the heart of the ‘equality and diversity’ dogma that dominates American corporate life. The memo didn’t address this paradox directly, but I think it’s implicit in the author’s critique of Google’s diversity programs. This dogma relies on two core assumptions:
1. The human sexes and races have exactly the same minds, with precisely identical distributions of traits, aptitudes, interests, and motivations; therefore, any inequalities of outcome in hiring and promotion must be due to systemic sexism and racism;
2. The human sexes and races have such radically different minds, backgrounds, perspectives, and insights, that companies must increase their demographic diversity in order to be competitive; any lack of demographic diversity must be due to short-sighted management that favors groupthink.
The obvious problem is that these two core assumptions are diametrically opposed.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: The Google Memo: 4 Scientists Respond
Nailed it. Plus the results just aren't there from diversity. People of liked minds tend to get more done.USN_Hokie wrote:This is a great point that really deserves highlighting. You see this same trend in almost every gender equality program:
He then goes on to explain precisely why this is the case. It's a sharp argument.Here, I just want to take a step back from the memo controversy, to highlight a paradox at the heart of the ‘equality and diversity’ dogma that dominates American corporate life. The memo didn’t address this paradox directly, but I think it’s implicit in the author’s critique of Google’s diversity programs. This dogma relies on two core assumptions:
1. The human sexes and races have exactly the same minds, with precisely identical distributions of traits, aptitudes, interests, and motivations; therefore, any inequalities of outcome in hiring and promotion must be due to systemic sexism and racism;
2. The human sexes and races have such radically different minds, backgrounds, perspectives, and insights, that companies must increase their demographic diversity in order to be competitive; any lack of demographic diversity must be due to short-sighted management that favors groupthink.
The obvious problem is that these two core assumptions are diametrically opposed.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: The Google Memo: 4 Scientists Respond
That brings up another good point. The Google *diversity* head who provided the company response to the memo has a total conflict of interest in providing any rebuttal to it. If the memo is right (and it is), she serves no purpose - actually, she would be (and she is) counter productive.awesome guy wrote:Nailed it. Plus the results just aren't there from diversity. People of liked minds tend to get more done.USN_Hokie wrote:This is a great point that really deserves highlighting. You see this same trend in almost every gender equality program:
He then goes on to explain precisely why this is the case. It's a sharp argument.Here, I just want to take a step back from the memo controversy, to highlight a paradox at the heart of the ‘equality and diversity’ dogma that dominates American corporate life. The memo didn’t address this paradox directly, but I think it’s implicit in the author’s critique of Google’s diversity programs. This dogma relies on two core assumptions:
1. The human sexes and races have exactly the same minds, with precisely identical distributions of traits, aptitudes, interests, and motivations; therefore, any inequalities of outcome in hiring and promotion must be due to systemic sexism and racism;
2. The human sexes and races have such radically different minds, backgrounds, perspectives, and insights, that companies must increase their demographic diversity in order to be competitive; any lack of demographic diversity must be due to short-sighted management that favors groupthink.
The obvious problem is that these two core assumptions are diametrically opposed.