Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Your Virginia Tech Politics and Religion source
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by cwtcr hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by awesome guy »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
WestEndHokie39
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:42 pm

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by WestEndHokie39 »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
On one hand, it's a terrible ruling.

On the other hand, the results of the "ban" will demonstrate how utterly useless, at best, and utterly deadly to innocent citizens, at worst, any "ban" is...

Sadly, people like ip will not learn a thing from it...
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?
Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by awesome guy »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?
Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.
Cracker Jack box?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?
Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.
Cracker Jack box?
so the 4th circuit is a bunch of morans?
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by awesome guy »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote: Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where did you get your law degree?
Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.
Cracker Jack box?
so the 4th circuit is a bunch of morans?
They are on this case, your style of tyranny.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/[/quote]

Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god[/quote]

I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]Where did you get your law degree?[/quote]

Maybe from the same place the 4th circuit did.[/quote]Cracker Jack box?[/quote]

so the 4th circuit is a bunch of morans?[/quote]They are on this case, your style of tyranny.[/quote]

got it.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
BigDave
Posts: 8012
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:20 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by BigDave »

ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk
133743Hokie
Posts: 11220
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by 133743Hokie »

BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
....and secede from the union.
WestEndHokie39
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:42 pm

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by WestEndHokie39 »

133743Hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
....and secede from the union.
...and establish their own bathroom rules and opt out of socialized health care plan.
WestEndHokie39
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:42 pm

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by WestEndHokie39 »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Allowing the 4th circuit's ruling that semi-automatic rifles are not constitutionally protected. Good stuff here.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/11/27/sup ... -ban-case/
Its a good thing criminals worry sooooo much about supreme court rulings, whew, thank god
I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Except for single payer health care, right? That would like to ram down everyone's throats...
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
BigDave
Posts: 8012
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:20 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by BigDave »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by cwtcr hokie »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you are getting killed with your hypocrisy, you may just want to move on. As others have rightly pointed out, the rules are for all the nation but lets adjust for certain spots....not a plan that will end in good consequences.

Never mind that criminals already break lots of laws, making another one will not stop a single criminal act
cwtcr hokie
Posts: 13399
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by cwtcr hokie »

BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.
unless it involves baking a cake for someone, then the gov. has to use force
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.
Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by awesome guy »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.
Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

cwtcr hokie wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you are getting killed with your hypocrisy, you may just want to move on. As others have rightly pointed out, the rules are for all the nation but lets adjust for certain spots....not a plan that will end in good consequences.

Never mind that criminals already break lots of laws, making another one will not stop a single criminal act
you don't seem to understand federalism, or the notion that some things are permitted (or not permitted) in some places, and not permitted (or permitted) in others. for example, Massachusetts has a form of "free" single payer health care. that's a good thing.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
BigDave
Posts: 8012
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:20 pm
Alma Mater: Virginia Tech
Party: Republican

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by BigDave »

awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?
Because IP doesn't like it.

IP, what exactly do you think a semi-automatic weapon is?

Semi-automatic only means that you don't have to re-cock it before shooting again. We're not talking about machine guns.
Posted from my Commodore 64 using Tapatalk
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:I’m happy the localities are allowed to govern themselves as they best see fit.
... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.
Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?
Because I value the ability of a locality to ban semi-automatic weapons over the right of citizen who chooses to live in that locality to own a semi-automatic weapon.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
ip_law-hokie
Posts: 19133
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
Alma Mater: Manchester
Location: New York, NY

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by ip_law-hokie »

BigDave wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?
Because IP doesn't like it.

IP, what exactly do you think a semi-automatic weapon is?

Semi-automatic only means that you don't have to re-cock it before shooting again. We're not talking about machine guns.
OK. Still OK with it.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
User avatar
awesome guy
Posts: 54187
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
Party: After 10
Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified

Re: Props to the 4th Circuit and SC

Post by awesome guy »

ip_law-hokie wrote:
awesome guy wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote:
ip_law-hokie wrote:
BigDave wrote: ... which is why we allow localities to torture suspects into confession, suppress free speech, and establish Presbyterianism as the official state religion.
In this instance. I’m glad that localities are allowed to govern themselves as they see fit in this instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In other words, you want localities to do things you like, whether they are forced to do so by the national government or choose to do so themselves.
Not at all. The predisposition should be to allow localities to do as they want. Of course there are limits. The inability to own semi-automatic weapons should not be one of those limits. I'm glad its not.
Because?
Because I value the ability of a locality to ban semi-automatic weapons over the right of citizen who chooses to live in that locality to own a semi-automatic weapon.
Regardless of what the constitution says. Got it
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Post Reply