I have no idea.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
$130,000
Forum rules
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
Be Civil. Go Hokies.
-
- Posts: 11220
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:29 am
Re: $130,000
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30321
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: $130,000
Depends what is is.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
No. Seriously. We don’t know how the Trump’s define faithfulness.
Being that this allegation covers something before he ever entered political life, it doesn’t matter. It’s all just a mud fight.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Re: $130,000
He definitely did, but Trump isn’t a Bible thumper and his image is one where you wouldn’t be surprised by it.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fully vaccinated, still not dead
Re: $130,000
Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: $130,000
Besides Trump of course, is there a candidate one could have supported while still maintaining integrity?USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- HokieHam
- Posts: 26677
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:50 pm
- Location: Kicking over crayons in a safe space for libruls....
Re: $130,000
Not one on the ballot. I new what McMuffin was the second I started hearing about him.ip_law-hokie wrote:Besides Trump of course, is there a candidate one could have supported while still maintaining integrity?USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wrote in Rand Paul. I’m glad Trump won.
"if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever."
ip believes you can dial in a 78 year old man who suffers from deminishing mental function
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: $130,000
I should let USN answer, but I expect he would agree.HokieHam wrote:Not one on the ballot. I new what McMuffin was the second I started hearing about him.ip_law-hokie wrote:Besides Trump of course, is there a candidate one could have supported while still maintaining integrity?USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wrote in Rand Paul. I’m glad Trump won.
We’ve established that one cannot have integrity and have voted for the spook. Hillary seems obvious. Not sure about GJ.
So less than half of Americans have integrity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: $130,000
And you 100% know for sure that he did how? Again, as I asked the poster Once and he/she could NEVER explain how they knew for sure, please explain how you know for surenolanvt wrote:He definitely did, but Trump isn’t a Bible thumper and his image is one where you wouldn’t be surprised by it.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: $130,000
1. I don't know. Nobody here does.ElbertoHokie wrote:Forget all the accusations. Who here thinks trump did or did not sleep with the porn star? Does anyone here think he's actually been faithful to Melania for the extent of their marriage?
2. Since when have liberals been concerned with sanctity of traditional marriage? What if Trump self identifies as a bachelor?
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: $130,000
Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: $130,000
Why is he a spook?HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: $130,000
its in the thread, former cia employeeip_law-hokie wrote:Why is he a spook?HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: $130,000
From McMuffin's wiki page:ip_law-hokie wrote:Why is he a spook?HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Service/branch: Central Intelligence Agency
Years of service: 2001–2010
Rank: Operations officer
Unit: National Clandestine Service
Battles/wars: Global War on Terrorism
"I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm
Re: $130,000
He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.ip_law-hokie wrote:Why is he a spook?HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: $130,000
I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.HokieFanDC wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is he a spook?USN_Hokie wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.HokieFanDC wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.USN_Hokie wrote: Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: $130,000
Yeah. What did you think it is?ip_law-hokie wrote:I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.HokieFanDC wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.HokieFanDC wrote:Why is he a spook?USN_Hokie wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.HokieFanDC wrote: Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
-
- Posts: 13399
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:25 pm
Re: $130,000
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.[/quote]
Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.
All that hate is eating you up.[/quote]
Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.[/quote]
Why is he a spook?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.[/quote][/quote]
I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.[/quote]Yeah. What did you think it is?[/quote]
ITS RACIST!!!!!
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.[/quote]
Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.
All that hate is eating you up.[/quote]
Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.[/quote]
Why is he a spook?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]
He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.[/quote][/quote]
I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.[/quote]Yeah. What did you think it is?[/quote]
ITS RACIST!!!!!
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: $130,000
I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.awesome guy wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:Yeah. What did you think it is?HokieFanDC wrote:I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.ip_law-hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote:He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.USN_Hokie wrote:
Why is he a spook?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: $130,000
I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote:I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.awesome guy wrote:ip_law-hokie wrote:Yeah. What did you think it is?HokieFanDC wrote:I just googled "define:spook." I was not aware that it is a term for a spy. I was aware of the urban dictionary definition.ip_law-hokie wrote:HokieFanDC wrote: He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
Re: $130,000
LOL, you're in full Chewbacca defense. You should probably call me Trump Defense Brigade now.HokieFanDC wrote:Your McMuffin theory is one of the most twisted logical leaps ever on UWS.USN_Hokie wrote:Again - you voted for McMullen - you have no leg to stand on in criticizing the integrity of other candidates. At least Hoof ate a shirt sandwich knowing what he was getting. You voted for a fraud.HokieFanDC wrote:Mocking conversations who have ceded the moral high ground, doesn’t make me a liberal. It makes me a conservative who is consistent in condemning anyone who exhibits poor behavior.USN_Hokie wrote:1. You outed yourself as a liberal when you mocked conservatives earlier in this thread.HokieFanDC wrote: I didn't admit anything of the sort. You, making up things in your own head, has no bearing on reality. You also said that I supported Clinton and Obama, which is a ridiculous pile of nonsense. When you can come to conclusions like that, you have less than zero credibility.
Now, I'll cede that you have criticized Trump a few times in the past, but very mildly. But, you keep saying I support McMuffin, as if me voting for him in a the worst POTUS election lineup in our lifetime, is highly meaningful. Since Nov. 8th, the only one of us who has even thought about McMullin, is you. I don't support him, or care about him. And voting for him has nothing to do with my morals. But if you want to go down that path, then I'll take my choice over yours every day of the week. Comparing the morals of McMullin and Trump is not even close.
As for you being a spy, no kidding, no one has ever thought you would be. But, you call me a statist for supporting the CIA. If I'm a statist, I'm not sure where someone who chose to work for a government entity, falls, but it's several levels above me saying I respect the CIA. The CIA and Navy occupy the same government morality that you seem to be denigrating.
2. Never said you supported them, but it's odd you seem to criticize everyone but liberals (or when you do, it's vague flippant one liners. You save all your real effort for attacking conservatives.)
3. Thank you for admitting you lied in your characterization of my support for Trump.
4. Funny that you say you don't care about the candidate whose whole candidacy was a lie to help Hillary by (trying to) stealing Utah's electoral votes, then defend him. Thankfully, the good people of Utah have better judgment than you.
5. You keep missing (or more likely, ignoring) the point, bucko. You pretend to care about ethics while supporting a candidate whose job was to deceive, steal, lie, etc.. (all things I never was asked to do, thanks). You don't give a shirt, you just hate Drumpf.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
I don’t criticize everyone but liberals, you’re just too deep in your clouded reality to realize that. When I agree with the general board consensus, it’s one post and move on. When everyone agrees, it’s a short thread.
That’s your opinion of McMullin, not fact. Your whole mcmullin attack angle is simply pitiful.
And even though I’ve said it many times, I think a lot of Trumps policies are good, but Trump the person, severely lacking. If you want to call that hate, have a it. I hate Hillary, everything about her.
I don’t hate everything about Trump, but he is a deceitful liar, and that’s a fault of his that you seem to think has meaning for a POTUs candidate nobody, but not for the guy you strongly support.
That’s why you lack moral high ground.
All that hate is eating you up.
By your own twisted standard, you have no leg to stand on in questioning the integrity of McMullin. So, here we are, and neither of us can criticize any candidate. Derp.
One big difference. I voted for McMullin b/c I think I have a duty to vote, and couldn't vote for either of the leading candidates, both of whom had less integrity than all the others. But, I haven't supported him, or defended any of what he's said or done, since then. In fact, he's been a giant douche.
But, I like your concept. Please stand by your own conclusions and refrain from criticizing the integrity of any other politician, since you actively support one who has none.
Congratulations on your vote which supported more leftists while pretending that your shirt doesn't stink, though.
Re: $130,000
Stop trying to sugarcoat your BS. McMuffin was an undercover, overseas CIA operative (still is?). Aka "spook."HokieFanDC wrote: He was an intelligence officer. Apparently intelligence officers are immoral people. Who knew.
I'm sorry, I thought you started your hissy fit because you thought Trump was lying? Do you think spies don't lie? Is lying ethical, or only when allowed by your religion (the state)?
Re: $130,000
The first thing which came to IP's mind when I said "spook" was the derogatory term for a black person, apparently.awesome guy wrote:I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote: I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.
- awesome guy
- Posts: 54187
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:10 pm
- Party: After 10
- Location: Plastic Flotilla:Location Classified
Re: $130,000
That's Methchester for ya.USN_Hokie wrote:The first thing which came to IP's mind when I said "spook" was the derogatory term for a black person, apparently.awesome guy wrote:I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote: I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.
Unvaccinated,. mask free, and still alive.
- RiverguyVT
- Posts: 30321
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:30 pm
Re: $130,000
Confirmation bias in spades.awesome guy wrote:That's Methchester for ya.USN_Hokie wrote:The first thing which came to IP's mind when I said "spook" was the derogatory term for a black person, apparently.awesome guy wrote:I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote: I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.
So I put (the dead dog) on her doorstep!
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
Salute the Marines
Soon we'll have planes that fly 22000 mph
"#PedoPete" = Hunter's name for his dad.
- ip_law-hokie
- Posts: 19133
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 pm
- Alma Mater: Manchester
- Location: New York, NY
Re: $130,000
How is that?RiverguyVT wrote:Confirmation bias in spades.awesome guy wrote:That's Methchester for ya.USN_Hokie wrote:The first thing which came to IP's mind when I said "spook" was the derogatory term for a black person, apparently.awesome guy wrote:I'm not. What's the Danville definition?ip_law-hokie wrote: I wasn't sure what USN was trying to say. Like I said, I'm aware of the Danville definition of the term.
With their Cap’n and Chief Intelligence Officer having deserted them, River, Ham and Joe valiantly continue their whataboutismistic last stand of the DJT apology tour.